2004 Volvo XC90 review from North America
"Volvo just lost a customer"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Chrome molding faded around all windows at 22,000 miles.
Rear wheel hobs replaced at 32,000 miles.
Front rotors replaced at 34,000 miles.
Front rotors replaced at 62,000 miles.
Engine mount replaced at 75,000 miles.
Tie rod replaced at 75,000 miles.
Ball joints replaced at 75,000 miles.
Windshield wiper arm replaced at 75,000 miles.
Transmission fluid flush at 90,000 miles.
Transmission out at 91,000 miles.
General comments?
This car was built to break!!!
Recommended reviews
| Poorly engineered with major malfunctions. Other than that it looks nice and has a comfortable ride |
|
| A dream to drive |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 2004 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | T6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 3 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 14000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 91000 miles |
| Previous car | Acura TL |
| Date of Entry | 28th August, 2008 |