1979 Buick Skyhawk Hatchback from North America - Comments

4th Aug 2007, 13:07

"A generally satisfactory car, which would have really excelled if only it were more fun to drive!"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

The clutch and pressure plate went out at approximately 30000 miles with the 4-speed manual transmission.

No other major malfunctions.

General comments?

This car was just begging to be hopped up! The 231 V6 was a late-1970s smog engine, so it was predictably anemic. In my unofficial acceleration test, I got a 0-to-60 time in just over 13 seconds. (Given the 3300 pound weight of car+driver, this works out to about 120 horsepower.)

At the time I owned this car, the great potential of the 3.8-liter engine was just being tapped into by hot-rodders. It was no exaggeration that nearly 200 horsepower was achievable with only a handful of relatively inexpensive modifications. Ah, but if I'd only had the time...


5th Aug 2007, 16:27

You sure don't see many rear wheel drive Buick Skyhawk's or any of the H-body cars built from 1975-80, I think they're one of GM's most underrated cars and I feel they deserve more recognition than what they get.


29th Apr 2008, 22:08

I will have to agree with you

i personally own a 79 and it sofar has treated me great

if GM would have made this car more race oriented then the sale of this car would have been a lot better

these cars were cheap to drop a V8 in to and also had the plus that they were considerably light compared to its rivals

these cars were designed to compete with toyotas celicas and the mustang II's and power capability wise and price wise the skyhawks were by far the better buys for that time.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Buick Skyhawk reviews