1979 Mercedes-Benz W123 240D from North America - Comments

1st Apr 2008, 07:52

"The car has been the best thing I've ever done"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

~RUST~ Major issue, but easily reparable. look for floor pans near rear seats, as well as front sub-frame.

Had pans completely replaced @ 238000.

~Starter, common dead spots. not yet replaced but still functional.

~Slave Cylinder 242000 miles.

General comments?

~Incredibly Slow.

~About the same mpg as a 300D turbo or N/A.

~ ultra reliable.

~block heater isn't necessary.

~ brakes can get temper-mental.

No ABS : (

4 speed manual is AMAZING.


1st Apr 2008, 19:35

Ha we also had a 1979 240D and our experience was about like yours, but the rust we had was a result of a bad paint job done by the "restoration" shop. The only other problem we ever had was the A/C compressor failed when the car was 18 years old (~wow~). You say no ABS, but ours did have "anti-skid" brakes, a primitive form of ABS, only difference being that they were not electronically controlled. Ours was also incredibly slow, and you're right about the mileage; the same can be accomplished in the 300D/TD versions which are much more powerful. Great cars, will have another W123 one day hopefully.


3rd Jul 2008, 12:48

I don't understand this primitive ABS system. All of the w123 ABS are electronic.


2nd Aug 2008, 11:46

I'm looking at buying one of these cars. What is the mpg?


4th Aug 2008, 12:58

I've heard of mid 40's with these on average.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Mercedes-Benz W123 reviews