2000 Nissan Cefiro Excimo from Malaysia - Comments

None.

Having owned a Volvo 850 2.5 GLE, the 2 litre Cefiro has been a real delight since day one. The VQ engine is excellent and a lot quieter than the Volvo. The suspension is too firm for my liking.

Overall, better value for money than the Volvo.

I currently drive a Mitsubitshi Galant VRV6. After an unintentional pop-in to a Cerfiro last week, I was totally impressed with its handling and suspension. Engine noise was well low, though the pick-up feels a little slow compared with the Mit-Galant. Nevertheless, I placed booking for 1 unit and I can't wait for the delivery. Great Car!!

It's a quiet car. Disappointed when cornering. I think the suspension is too soft for cornering.

Can any other Cefiro Excimo owners tell me what you think about the fuel consumption of this car?

I am a new owner of a 1999 Nissan Cefiro STouring model. It drives and feels comfortable. The comfort is good compared to previous vehicles I have owned. A luxury ride - slow or moderate speed - is on smooth highway road. Only time will tell. I would like to comment in about 6 months and 12 months from now.

A good ride.

I have a request: how can I get

1 an owner's manual

2 information to inform my choice between 15" or 16" rims and tyres.

Information on these vehicles is scarce.

Thanks in advance.

L.L. Hercules.

I am the owner of a 1996 model Nissan Cefiro,

I find that the pick-up is slow and the fuel consumption is erratic. I would like to get a workshop manual.

Got my Cefiro 2.0 in 2000. I have done 90000km todate in this car and is totally satisfied with it. Great comfortable and silent car. A gem of an engine. Acceleration is weak, but once on the go it is fine with the engine very willing to rev creamy smooth. The suspension set up is a bit confusing; too hard when going over ridges, but too soft when cornering.

As far as fuel consumption goes, I am totally happy with it considering it is a 2.0 V6. I consistently return 9.5km/liter on a full tank with city driving. Although I have to qualify that I am a very economical driver with a light right foot and prefer to cruise most of the times rather than hard acceleration and stopping.

All in all a very pleasant ownership experience.

It has 6 cylinders for 2 liters and the bore is smaller than the 4 cylinders in 2 liters.

For this reason the torque is lower and overtaking is a bit sluggish.

On the other hand is quiter, smaller masses move in the engine and the engine goes faster in revs.

Ady.

I have a 94 2.5 love it brillant car no problems at all good powerful and economical 10 ltr per 100 km which is better than my old galant 20 ltr 4 cylinder and you have the power all in all a great car my father inlaw runs 2 cefiros as taxis doing 300-500km per day with no problems.

This is my second Cefiro. I like the older version below 1994 model.

I have first my 1990 Turbo.. which is like a wild horse when you are a heavy footed driver. It floats like a kite when I hit the bumpy road. But keep an eye on the radiator supply, never run with leaking radiator it will end up in gasket blown up. Sorry it was stolen.

Next my 1993 after my Pulsar which I considered too feminine.

This one is A31 non turbo but still drives very good and very economical, but it was funny cause I always have a full tank of petrol until I was running out of fuel with gauge indicating F, and my back window opens whenever I start the engine, can be closed only at the passenger at the back, which is a bit hard when you are alone.. hehe but really a good car..

Auckland, New Zealand.