2003 Mazda 3 S 5DR from North America - Comments

The driver door weather-stripping removed itself from the track and was reseated under warranty.

The sunroofs exterior gasket is beginning to show signs of weathering normally reserved for cars approaching the decade mark in age.

An airbag sensor recall is in effect for some 2004 models.

Acceleration is decent with a minimum amount of torque-steer and power is adequate; even with 4 adults along for the journey.

There is a very strange hesitation in power application when depressing the accelerator pedal. It seems almost as if there is a built-in delay in fuel delivery to the cylinders. This characteristic is supposedly unique to the 5-speed transmission and is per design, but really effects nothing more than my curiosity.

I would prefer more torque to be present when shifting into second gear from first. Obviously a gearing design, but one I would like to see rectified. From 3rd to 2nd is fine.

The seats provide good support and are comfortable for long distances. The fabric is unique in that it repels liquids and dirt very well. In my experience that includes food, dog drool, and seawater. And dog drool.

The chassis of the 3 is shared with that of Ford's European 2005 Focus and Volvo's S40. It handles extremely well and feels like it belongs on a car with German heritage. The ride quality is slightly compromised due to chassis rigidity and the fantastic 17 inch Goodyear Eagles that come standard.

Cabin noise varies greatly depending on road surfaces. Quiet and refined on smoother roads, this quickly gives way to an almost unacceptable ruckus on roads of lesser quality. But wait a minute, doesn't this car cost under $20k? This is the only indication, and an issue that could probably be resolved with a different tire choice.

Split fold-down rear seating provides more cargo room than some compact SUVs. More stylish, fun, and a gas mileage return of over 32mpg should realistically make the 3 5dr an alternative to entry-level SUVs. For example: I regularly haul two 17 ft sea kayaks and accompanying gear for day trips.

This car is $5,000 under priced.

SHHHHHHH!!! Don't tell Mazda it is under-priced! I haven't gotten mine yet! :)

Why did you rate the running costs as 3/10? Or was this a mistake?

It was indeed a mistake. The running costs run par with the overall value for the money: Excellent. I apologize for the mistake and sincerely hope it didn't negatively affect any decision you made. T.G.

I'm 6' 2" and I couldn't fit in the Scion. A Mazda 3S five door would be the same price as the Scion (remember, Mazda dealers can discount, Scion is fixed pricing) and would have more features, not less (like leather). Plus, the Scion has zero room in the back seats.

Reviews of the Mazda 3 here have been positive, but you're right that Mazda as a whole is not up to par with Toyota.

I don't think that Ford's ownership would mean bad quality for a Japanese maker like Mazda. Ford owns Mazda for many years and it would have shown by now if they were making unreliable cars. Among other companies, Ford owns Volvo as well = unreliable cars? I don't think so.

Actually, a friend of mine worked at Mazda for a while. He said that the Mazda 3 is still made in Japan, whereas the Mazda 6 is made in America by Ford. So the 3 is still graced by Japanese quality and design.

Ford does not OWN Mazda. It does have an equity stake in Mazda of 33.4%. Ford & Mazda have had an ALLIANCE now since 1969. Most of the design & production decisions for Mazda vehicles are still made by Mazda. Ford shares its managerial & marketing expertise with Mazda. Mazda shares its production & quality expertise with Ford. So that is why the reliability for Mazda vehicles is still apparent.

Vic.