2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 from North America - Comments

Comments: 1-15, 16-27

16th Jan 2005, 13:59

"Mercedes build quality + German refinement = One stunning sports car!"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Except for a faulty hydraulic locking unit on the trunk, there have been no problems with the Crossfire.

General comments?

Wonderful car, I love it like a brother. Probably the best German-built sports car to emerge this decade!

Mercedes quality is present everywhere on the car - the interior is all chrome. However, the chrome is slippery - and it can be hard to shift the chrome lever.

Blisteringly fast - 160 mph top speed on the Autobahn and a brisk accelerator.

The interior is very welcoming, but the leather is very cold in the winter.

The car has a striking appearance with its low body and lines.


17th Jan 2005, 20:59

Wow! You must like to drive. According to your review you've put 6,500 miles on the Crossfire in 16 days!

Vote:

19th Feb 2005, 16:39

Hi there! That was a mistake. I have had the car for a year and have driven it 6500 miles since. Sorry for the misunderstanding ;)

Vote:

30th Mar 2005, 14:56

He also doesn't explain where he found an "Autobahn" in N America to drive this car at 160 mph...

Vote:

11th Aug 2005, 13:47

I drove one of these, thought it was extremely claustrophobic. Not enough interior room and the rear window is tiny. Strange design.

Vote:

22nd Aug 2005, 23:04

Recently purchased a 2005 SRT Crossfire, pre-owned 4100 miles for under 32K. Resale value could be a problem, but performance certainly not lacking. World class power, handling, and brakes as described in all auto mags and then some. Excellent Mercedes quality. Main downside of vehicle is rear vision, although mainly to see who you've just passed. Very happy with purchase.

Vote:

23rd Jan 2006, 16:42

I have a 2004 Crossfire and am already wanting to trade it in. The blind spots are almost dangerous and the wind noise is distracting. The acceleration is nice, but it fish tails often.

Vote:

30th Jan 2006, 14:06

For all of the "comfort" in a Crossfire, you might as well drive an old Pinto.

Decent acceleration & handling. Funky/weird styling.

Visibility is bad, interior space (even for short people) is terrible.

Come to think of it, the Pinto would even be roomier.

Vote:

24th Mar 2006, 17:00

I recently had a chance to drive an '06 Crossfire... a friend of mine was using one as a loaner while his car was in the shop.

PROS: Great acceleration. Smooth and acute.

Great handling.

Killer looks and design.

CONS: I don't know where everybody gets this "Mercedes quality interior" thing. Definitely not up to par with a Mercedes. Looks nice, but poor use of inferior plastics.

Extremely poor visibility... this car is an accident waiting to happen in that regard.

Vote:

24th Mar 2006, 23:47

You people ought to think about what kind of car this is. It's a small two seat roadster sportscar. Its not supposed to very comfortable, have good insulation, have great visibility, and have lots of room. Its all about the driving plain and simple.

The guy with the 2004 crossfire who complains about fishtailing obviously doesn't know the dynamics of driving a semi-powerful RWD sports car around a corner.

Vote:

17th Jun 2006, 20:50

The Crossfire is a very unique car, it's not for everyone. The styling is very "concept car" with strakes in the hood, large hips over the rear tires, tiny side windows... very much a concept car. Weird is not a term I'd apply, "different" definitely! Many people find this a bit too risky for their tastes. This car is very much about the driving experience, one meager cup holder, which is one too many for some who get this car for the driving experience. The cabin is tight, but, then again that's exactly what some of us are looking for in a two sporty car. I can't blame for not finding this a good choice for a daily driver, but those who love the feel of the road, and prefer balance and handling over just pure HP, this car is a consideration. Tall and "larger" people may not find this the right car for them.

Vote:

19th Jun 2006, 11:05

I'm not sure why everyone keeps going on about "Mercedes build quality"...the engine might be the 3.2L Mercedes V-6, but everything else is Chrysler.

Vote:

20th Jun 2006, 11:51

I wish that people would research and experience the crossfire before making flippant comments about this excellent car. First of all the crossfire is 65% Daimler from the Mercedes parts bin which translates it 95% mechanical. But if you drove this car you would have experienced this. I have own several cars in my lifetime mostly new and from several automakers and believe me when I say there is the possibility of good and bad in all. This car is excellent, not that it doesn't have it's??? but it is nothing, but excitement to own and drive. Great Value just not a very good marketing job buy Chrysler and People need to remember what type of car this is, it is not your Camry or every day driver. Well done Daimler.

Vote:

22nd Aug 2006, 01:29

It seems to me many of Crossfire's critics have never owned one or driven one on a regular basis. I have a 2004, which I drive daily. The car is a joy to drive. It has to die for good looks and handles well. It is also not for everybody... no car is.

I have owned a 240Z, a corvette, a stealth 3000 and a Porsche 928 and a ford Mustang. This car is my favorite of all the others. When my 7 year warranty runs out, I'll buy another one.

Vote:

24th Aug 2006, 23:01

The Crossfire is definitely a step up in terms of refinement compared to the older Chryslers. Crap, my Lebaron looks like a Fisher Price toy next to the Crossfire. I'd say it is a nice different car that is easy enough to own by the average American. Love it or hate it, it's your choice.

Vote:

18th Sep 2006, 23:14

I don't think you will be able to buy a Crossfire in another 7 years, as one of the comments suggested.

With such low sales, I doubt they'll be making them much longer.

Vote:

Next 12 comments

All Chrysler Crossfire reviews