1983 Volvo 240 GL from Australia and New Zealand - Comments

14th Sep 2005, 04:10

"Mild, unreliable sports car wrapped in ugly family-car body"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Something in transmission is chipped, causes huge clunks at random. Gearbox would need replacing to fix this.

Intermittent setting on windscreen wipers never worked.

Tyres have a habit of falling off the rims when maneuvering to avoid accidents (has happened 4 times so far).

Rear seat belts do not retract properly.

Engine takes almost 2 minutes of cranking and throttling to start on cold days.

Idles very, very rough, even after tune-up.

Numerous interior plastics are simply falling apart.

Driver's seat foam/springs collapsed.

Driver's seat lumbar support collapsed.

Electric antenna no longer goes up and down.

Glove box latch broke, unable to open.

Hood release mechanism faulty, takes a lot of effort to open and extremely difficult to close.

Car will not run with less than a half-full petrol tank, runs rough for a while and then starts to cut out.

Large clunking noises from rear of car when starting/stopping/turning.

General comments?

For a Volvo at 165, 000kms, this car is pretty much just run-in - and a real disappointment.

Ride quality is terrible, it shudders and jumps over the slightest imperfections on the road. Passengers absorb every bump, not the suspension.

It really goes when pushed, it can hose almost any other car built in the 1980s including a few V8s. It handles nicely, only gets upset through corners when you throttle or brake much too hard. A really fun car in the wet. Revs out to 8000rpm, although redline is at 7000 - screams like a banshee after 4000rpm and really takes off!

Lots of interior space for such a small car (240s look big, but they're really not that much bigger than 3-series BMWs).

Comfy seats all round, apart from driver's seat which has worn out.

Overall, could be a nice car if built to last, and suspension is the worst I've ever seen in a car. Just a big disappointment really, the shiny, expensive-looking exterior hides a very badly built vehicle.


16th Sep 2005, 16:47

The performance aspect of this car does not sound like a normal 240 - particularly the 8000rpm bit. It sounds like it's been modified and then seriously thrashed.

Also, after 22 years, you might expect some wear and tear on the interior.

I don't think Volvo ever pushed these things as being sports saloons - if you wanted such a Beemer would have been a better bet.


3rd Oct 2005, 20:21

Hmm. Modifications are possible, I wouldn't know as I've never had a knowledgable mechanic really check the car out. I guess it may have been used to race (?) or something at one point, not too clear on its history, but apparently it has only had two owners.

Doesn't bother me too much anymore, I only have to live with the hunk of junk for another few weeks, at which point I might check out a few other 240s to see what the performance/ride is like in more 'standard' ones. If it's the same as this one, I'll never touch one again!


11th Jun 2006, 08:31

Are you shore that you have a volvo 240??? I have a 240 station it had 7 owners before me has about 500.000 km on the clock!!! wastes no water or oil, the last owner used it to put a little boat inside and to run in the forest to get wood. I have it for about 4-5 years and she´s always ready to work!!! WHAT A CAR!!! I LOVE HER (I TREAT IT BY HER BECAUSE SHE DESERVES).

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Volvo 240 reviews