2003 Lexus RX300 AWD from North America - Comments

17th Dec 2005, 11:18

"Do consider 2003 highlander limited"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Transmission problem with 3.0 liter

4 speed automatic AWD.

General comments?

This review is for 2003 RX 300 AWD (US market). We were in the market for one and realized that lexus RX went to the 3.3 liter (330) with 5 speed transmission in 2004 (that’s the new shape). After reading the reviews on this and other websites we decided to stay away from the 2004 and higher models due to transmission problems. We drove at least 10 2003 RX300 with AWD (3.0 liter engine with 4 speed transmission) in Chicago, IL market. They all had 30K to 50K miles. While the vehicles were nice, they all had some problems. Most of the vehicles had the transmission surge problem every one is talking about (I was surprised to see hesitation in 4 speed transmission as well). Some had electrical/cd related problems. The vehicles were also at the lexus and other reputable dealerships and they all refused to agree on transmission problems.

We ended up buying a 2003 highlander limited with leather and heated seats. It has 55K miles, but drives very nice. Although it shares a lot of parts with RX, the transmission seems to be okay (we have only owned it a month). Not sure why, but highlander seems to have better ride and power then its RX sibling.


21st Dec 2005, 08:32

The 01-03 Highlander's transmission and engine are the EXACT same thing as the 99-03 rx300. The Highlander's materials aren't even close in quality as the Lexus.


23rd Sep 2006, 11:13

I agree, the RX300 is a much nicer vehicle than the Highlander, although it shares the basic platform & drive-train.

I can't imagine even a Highlander owner feeling differently.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Lexus RX300 reviews