1995 Mazda MX6 LS 2.5L V6 DOHC

Summary:

An amazing vehicle to learn to drive in

Faults:

I have had major clutch problems, and the power steering fluids are now running a bit low.

The electrical fried when my mom was driving the car in heavy rain.

The vehicle was sold after a major accident, and as a result, the A/C has never worked the entire time we've owned it.

General Comments:

I would not recommend the vehicle to anyone of approximately my height (6'2").

The KLZE engine is a brilliant power plant, and can be easily tuned, with many parts available for the work.

A wonderful vehicle to learn to drive in, since it has great acceleration, an amazing feel, and can turn and maneuver it's way out of anything.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 28th July, 2005

1995 Mazda MX6 2.5 V6

Summary:

I really enjoy driving my mx-6, I would recommend it

Faults:

CV Boot has cracked twice since I have owned the car.

Rear speed sensor started failing at 155000 miles.

Replaced front struts at 150000 miles.

A/C compressor just went at 159000 miles.

Clutch spring is making noise.

General Comments:

A very sleek looking car. I get occasional head turns. Factory rims are bland, recommend getting aftermarket rims, they do wonders to the appearence of the car. The car handles very well. It does well off the line, but at higher speeds acceleration is lacking. Overall I am very satisfied with the car. No major problems so far.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th May, 2005

3rd Jun 2005, 17:32

Please, add more information about suggested aftermarket trim.

12th Aug 2005, 14:56

He said after market RIMS not trim. As in wheels.

1995 Mazda MX6

Summary:

I would rather own a Honda or Toyota

Faults:

I purchased the car in February of this year and my husband looked at the engine and we test drove it and it looked and sounded fine however within a very short time-

My driver's side wheel bearing went out.$200.

Both CV boots cracked and had to be replaced.

The car started stalling out and the O2 Sensor had to be replaced $300.

Then my transmission went out and it was $2000 for a used one because they are few and far between and it wasn't able to be rebuilt. I do not know how long the one put in the car will last so I hated to spend the 2 grand on it.

Also the car leaks when it rains.

General Comments:

I have always bought older Japanese cars and have never had a problem other than general maintenance. I did not know when I bought the Mazda that it had Ford parts.

It drives well when it is fixed and it looks nice, but the 3 months I have owned it have been very frustrating.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 20th May, 2005

25th Nov 2005, 21:03

Just a few general thoughts.

Replacing a wheel bearing and cv boots on a car of 100+k miles isn't unreasonable.

As for the transmission. One always hopes to get more than 100k out of the drive train of a car so I can understand your frustration.

The only thing I'd add to this is that, if I'm not mistaken, this car shares it's drive train with the Ford Probe. So, while the MX6 may be somewhat rare in the salvage yards, the probe should be rather common?

Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong on this, but a Probe transmission should fit right up to this car?

2nd Aug 2006, 01:35

The MX6, 626, and probe are build upon the same chassis (floor pan). But the drive trains tend to vary in compatibility, depending on configuration. For example the CV shafts interchange, but engine/trans mounts might not. Consequently mounting bosses on trannies may be different. I'm somewhat of a junkyard hound, and IMO junk Probes with good ATs are hard to find. MTs were more popular.

15th Aug 2006, 21:34

I used to own a Ford Probe myself, and a Mazda protege before that. The manual trans on the protege was still kickin' good at 118K, till I crashed it... actually it still drove after that. BUT, the AT Probe's tranny went 6 months after I got it at about 111K. I've done quite some research on the Mazdas and Probes. Basically, all the AT's are really unreliable, but the MTs are unbreakable.

30th Aug 2006, 16:03

My '94 Mazda MX6 (MT) still going strong at over 300k. Never a problem. MY CV boots will need to be replaced soon, but the service dept says it isn't critical.

I've had the car since '96, though, and have kept it maintained throughout the years. Might make the diff.