1995 Holden Calais review from Australia and New Zealand
"Don't get caught by the VS Commodore hype"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
It seems (unknown to me at the time of purchase) that VS Commodores come with a common bag of faults and traits. Mention the word VS and dribbling oil comes to mind.
Early VS Commodores had problems with the auto's - some being prone to serious failure with the clutch plates around the 80000 km mark, even when not driven harshly. Secondly the majority of VS Commodore autos torque converters will burn out quite considerably when beyond the 200000 km mark due to a design flaw. Alas mine suffered clutch plate failure (yes auto's have clutch plates) around the 110000 mark, resulting in a $2000 costly changeover. The symptoms being when up shifting from second to third you get a harsh thump and when down-shifting from third to second the engine flares out to about 3000 RPM and when the planetary gear set engages - a harsh thud!
There's also the oil sump seal that needs replacing as it leaks oil. A common trait it seems.
The climate control also packed in resulting in a costly replacement.
General comments?
The VS Commodore, whether it be the Executive to the Calais, still holds onto the old harsh interior traits of the VN series. If Holden had invested a little more for the interior design then the VS series would be a nicer car.
The Ecotech engine is comparable to the current VT/VX line when it comes to maximum power output, but lacks the refinement of current models. Low-end torque is lesser and mid-high range revs produce a metallic rasp like sound.
One saving grace of the VS Calais is its Independent Rear Suspension, which makes road handling a breath or fresh air - the car hugs corners nicely at high speeds. The one drawback is the wheels only being 6.5 inches wide resulting in loss of traction when you really need it. The VS II Calais alas comes with 7-inch width wheels, which gives the extra traction when rightly needed.
The
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.8 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 104000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 114000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Ford Falcon |
| Date of Entry | 29th January, 2002 |

