1992 Ford Econoline E-150 review from North America
"An impressive looking, unreliable, money pit"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission wouldn't shift into reverse, rebuilt. This was the 4-speed overdrive.
Replaced front brake pads (semi-metallic) and rotors, then had to replace again less than 1 year later. Used ceramic pads this time, but within several months the front rotors were warped and had to replace rotors again. Ceramic pads still holding up OK, but they cost $70 so they'd better last more than a year.
Replaced radiator.
Starter went bad, replaced.
Right exhaust manifold cracked, replaced.
Left exhaust manifold now cracked, needs to be replaced.
Oil pan gasket blew out, will cost about $400 to replace because engine must be raised to replace gasket. Meanwhile, it leaks massive amounts of oil and smokes badly from under the engine while driving, especially on highway.
Replaced blower motor.
Replaced heater core.
Shifter component (not sure what to call it) broke inside the steering column allowing the shift lever to flop back and the van was stuck in park. The shop showed me the part, it was made of cheap cast pot metal. They said the dealer they order from goes through these things because they have a habit of breaking. Another $200.
Doors inside mixing chamber for heat/AC broken, so even though fan runs, heated or cooled air does not come out ducts, it just kind of drifts out under the dash.
Cigarette lighters quit working, so can't plug in accessories.
Replaced water pump.
Passenger door window no longer goes up with switch on driver's side.
Control arm bushings are worn and need replacement.
I'm not even counting the normal maintenance stuff, like battery, hoses (some were real buggers to get to), etc.
Supposed to have rear anti-lock brakes, but they don't work. Shop said it would cost about $750-800 to fix.
Cable mechanism that lifts spare tire up under the van malfunctioned, so tire is now stored under back seat. When cable got stuck I had to have a shop use a torch to cut the cable so I could get the spare tire out from under the van.
General comments?
This is a Mark III conversion van that I had high hopes for when we first bought it. Within a couple of months the trouble started, with the transmission going out. We figured it would be worth having it rebuilt because we planned on keeping the van, but it's turned into a money pit and for now it's just parked in the backyard. I'll do a few more repairs and sell it within a couple of months and I'll be glad to see it go.
Yeah it handles like a truck, but I expected that when I bought it. The ride is reasonably comfortable except that the driver's seat padding is broken down. If I were keeping the van I'd replace that.
The 5.0 engine is adequate, but I wouldn't care to have the smaller engine that was available on this model. I'd probably look for the larger engine if you planned on doing much towing.
Take it easy with driving with this thing. It wears front brakes way too fast and is pretty hard on front tires, too.
It goes without saying that gas mileage goes out the window with something this huge, so only count on 10-12 MPG in town and 13-14 on the highway. I rejoiced when I could actually get 14 on a road trip.
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | Real nice van, but you need deep pockets to keep her rolling. |
![]() ![]() | 1992 - Econoline E 350 ClubWagon 351 5.8 Tough as Nails, Always starts and drives! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 5.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 2/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 1/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 112000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 154000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Civic |
| Date of Entry | 29th December, 2003 |

