2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS review from North America
"Good car for the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Power windows failed, so I had them fixed at the dealership twice and that still wouldn't work so I went a third time and finally got it fixed.
Cheap factory tires bald at 30000 miles.
Back tail lights fog up. Had it tightened.
General comments?
Needs more power. Even the SS whats so super about it? Should be a V-8 so that it can be competetive with an SS Camaro. Even though it handles really well around corners in dry weather. Very spacious interior.
Recommended Reviews:
  | Love it and will keep it! |
| 2000 - Monte Carlo SS 3.8 Liter V6 A rocket for the money, almost more fun than previous Camaro |
All 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4L 3.8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | |
| Dealer Service marks | 3/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 20000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 39640 miles |
| Previous car | Pontiac Trans Sport |
| Date of Entry | 8th April, 2004 |