1980 Datsun 200SX review from North America
"Bulletproof and Long Lasting - The Most Reliable Car I've Ever Owned"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The rear brakes were a new disk brake design for Nissan and were dangerously bad. They didn't work well with the proportioning valve, and would often lock up.
After a near death experience, I rebuilt the rear brakes with new rotors an calipers. I had no serious problems after that. (BTW the design used in the 240SX is similar. They solved the lock up problem by using much smaller brake pads. That solved the lock up problem, but the it also means the 240SX rear brake pads wear prematurely... faster than the front pads).
The idle switch is touchy and needed to be adjusted.
I replaced the alternator at about 135,000 miles.
The clutch was replaced at about 120,000 miles.
General comments?
The 240SX was a decently performing and handling car.
The interior was OK, but not designed well nor put together well.
Mechanically, the car was incredible. Almost zero maintenance, and as reliable as a doorknob. The NAP-Z engine was a great engine.
It was also a dream to work on. It had plenty of room under the hood, and was actually engineered with servicing in mind.
Recommended Reviews:
  | Can't seem to part with it |
| 1979 - 200SX 2.0 I4 NAPZ motor The reason why imports are taking over |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 1980 |
| First year of ownership | 1982 |
| Engine and transmission | Manual |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 0/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 50000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 275000 miles |
| Previous car | Toyota Celica |
| Date of Entry | 3rd May, 2005 |