2005 Honda Jazz VTI 1.5 litre petrol

Summary:

Perfect!

Faults:

Car has been perfect except for the rear seatbelts, which the dealer changed because I have an extended warranty.

General Comments:

Reliable, zippy round town and fantastic fuel economy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th September, 2010

2005 Honda Jazz 1.5

Summary:

Everyone should own one! That said, I am worried about the CVT though

Faults:

Gearbox shudders at take off and coming to a halt.

General Comments:

Fantastic design, can fit anything in it, yet it's so compact.

Back sets are magic also; they fold away to nothing, giving a very spacious boot.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th February, 2008

5th Mar 2008, 13:44

Seems the Jazz is not as prefect as people make out, I have a 2004 CVT SE that sounds like a small diesel when cold its done just 25000 miles. The engine gets quieter when warmed up, but sounds quite disturbing when cold. Honda are trying to hold the problem at arms length at the moment!

5th Apr 2008, 20:59

CVT shudder on takeoff is normal. it seems to take a second to realise you want to move off. The next MY09 Jazz is rumoured to have either a torque converter on the CVT (missing on this model) or a conventional 5-speed automatic. I guess it depends on which specification will be sold in your home market.

Just change the CVT fluid every couple of years, that's all you can do to mitigate the risk.

2005 Honda Jazz Gli CVT 1.3

Summary:

Efficient and reliable, but not exciting at all

Faults:

Front tyres are wearing badly.

Both front window washer jets have failed.

Rear window washer jet broken off.

Rear door lock does not unlock intermittently.

General Comments:

Very economical, can do up to 5.3 L/100 km on regular unleaded.

Performance is adequate from the 1.3, and the CVT is quite responsive to driver input, although overtaking on hills under load needs some forward planning. I think the added power of the 1.5 would be unnecessary most of the time, especially considering the extra fuel that it uses.

I find the seats uncomfortable and unsupportive, and find my back hurts after medium to long journeys. No driver's foot rest is annoying.

Stereo is excellent for the money and equipment levels are also very generous. Cruise control is the only thing I would have liked!

Overall has been a satisfying and reliable car, but far from involving or exciting!

Cabin versatility is excellent and I have been surprised how often I have used the 'Magic Seats'! The car feels like a Tardis! It's amazing how much junk you can fit inside!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th January, 2006

2005 Honda Jazz VTi 1.5 VTEC

Summary:

Half car, half Tardis.

Faults:

Plastic cladding in driver's foot well came loose at 2,000km, however I'm not sure if this may have been because it was kicked accidentally a few times. Popped it back in place, no problems since.

General Comments:

After test driving both the 1.3 i-DSI (sold as the 1.4 i-DSI in Europe) and 1.5 VTEC, I decided that the extra money spent on the 1.5, with the extra 18kW or so that goes along with it, was worth the money. I was right.

Not only is the 1.5 able to give the little Jazz a pretty decent shove, it's also surprisingly frugal. I usually see around 7.5l/100km when driving around the city, and have seen consumption of under 6l/100km on the open road. Not too shabby for a small automatic.

The CVT automatic does take a little getting used to. When used in full automatic mode, it appears to take its time figuring out that the driver would like to move forwards. It's only a split second, but it does take some getting used to.

When using the 7-speed flappy paddle option, this delay of the CVT getting itself ready to move off appears to be eliminated. The 7-speed option is very handy for situations where you need to get out of the way in a hurry, or if you're overtaking on a country road, as it makes the best use of the Jazz's power.

That said, the full automatic mode makes the best of the Jazz's remarkable fuel economy. Let's face it, people buy the Jazz because they want good fuel economy.

The interior is a work of art. Overall, it is very well finished. Apart from an issue with a bit of plastic coming loose, as well as the top of the dashboard looking a little flimsy (the bit where the passenger airbag is has a tendency to wobble slightly at high speeds on bad roads), it's very well finished. For what it's worth, pretty much every other modern small car has loads of flimsy, poorly finished plastic. Honda plastic is just slightly less flimsy and cheap looking than most.

The CD player sounds good and the controls are big and easy to use. The integration into the dash gives the Jazz a very classy ambiance, however it could prove troublesome for an aftermarket car stereo/ICE installation.

The phrase 'magic seat' is something that is a lot more than some phrase that some drug-addled intern in a marketing department somewhere came up with. The flexible configuration and the low floor make the Jazz more flexible than a Chinese gymnast. You could easily fit a whole family in here - with all the luggage you'd need - without any dramas at all.

The outside of the car is tiny, and is so easy to park, even a visually impaired 3 year old could parallel park without external assistance.

The dealer service is very good. I can't put my finger on it, but Honda dealerships tend to be a more pleasant place to visit than most other car dealerships. This is coming from someone that visited a number of different dealers whilst looking for a new car.

The only drawbacks of the car that I can find so far are the steering (slightly lumpy at very low speed, vague at high speed) and the handling (competent, but not awe inspiring).

The CVT automatic gearbox, whilst a technical masterpiece, may also prove a little more troublesome than a conventional automatic gearbox long-term. I'm planning on hanging onto this car for at least 10 years, and I hope that the CVT - being relatively new technology - is able to hold together for a long time without requiring major surgery. Only time will tell, however I do take comfort in the fact that - generally speaking - Honda produce some of the most reliable cars on the road today.

If Honda could get the steering and the handling right, the Jazz would probably one of the all time greatest cars ever produced by a Japanese manufacturer. As it stands, the Jazz is very good... but falls short of true greatness by the narrowest of margins.

I should note that I am incredibly picky when it comes to cars, especially brand new ones. So, when it comes to complaints about plastic and handling, it should be said that 99% of the general population would struggle to come up with similar criticisms.

I'll report back in 12 months time and let you know if anything has died/fallen off. Not likely, but you never know.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 11th November, 2005

31st Dec 2005, 02:43

Have just tested a Jazz (in Melbourne) and became worried about its reactions to road humps. As I don't like asking dealers for a long enough test drive to encounter the humps and bumps one encounters on back roads in the hills, I try to see how a car will react to some mild road humps. The ones I use are close to home, and used to be marked '40km/h' recently they seem to have got a new '20km/h marking' (obviously due to the noise levels, the design remains the same and nothing has been done to the humps apart from steady flattening from their original 40 km/h design profiles over time).

The Jazz didn't like it at 20km/k, didn't like it at all at 40km/k and a little higher (but still lower than the prior tests that day with a Renault Clio, that performed faultlessly at all speeds) the Jazz was vague in its steering and felt unstable... the characteristics were those of incipient bump oversteer.. and as this was a typical event that one encounters in poor condition-outer suburban and country roads, on which my leaner/p plate daughter would go in it, I became instantly alarmed... especially as the competitor vehicle (s) had showed absolutely NO loss of stability at all with the dealer reps in the rear! As I had been about to return to the dealership and start the final sale negotiation (with expectation of completing it there and then), this was quite an issue for me..

Please, from your excellent review, perhaps you (or others?) could advise me if the Jazz is indeed marginal in its bump stability? substantial confidence in Hondas design implementation from this experience... and am actively seeking advice from actual owners. The dealer rep. on board was not only no help, but the exact reverse- which converted my brief passing concern into a serious alarm. I'd really appreciate some feedback in this area, as this instantly lost the Melbourne dealer concerned a near certain cash sale today... (he had no idea of this at all) not so much from the vagueness we felt- but in his alarm and responses to even CHECKING these key important factors!

As a long term Honda owner (40 years now, cars and motorcycles) this is a first ever in terms of such a clear dealer lack of confidence... and I want to find out if it was properly founded... if I don't its Mazda or Renault for me in future!