2005 Toyota Corolla Reviews from Australia and New Zealand

2005 Toyota Corolla GL 1.8 VVTi

Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2012
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 1.8 VVTi Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired78000 kilometres
Most recent distance88000 kilometres
Previous carNissan Pulsar

Summary:

Efficient, well-built and an enjoyable drive

Faults:

CD player doesn't work.

Intermittent clutch smell.

Blown headlight bulb.

General Comments:

As a city car, the Corolla is hard to beat. Even the entry-level GL has the 100 kW (135 BHP) engine, pulling a mere 1100 kg, which makes for ample get-up and go.

The gearshift is clunky but precise, and the hydraulic clutch is silky smooth.

Steering is nicely weighted and geared, all-disc brakes are fine, but the ABS is a little over-sensitive. Ride quality is very good, for a light car with conventional strut/torsion beam suspension.

Only major negatives are poor rearward visibility, and a lack of traction in the wet.

On the open road, it's not quite so accomplished. The low gearing makes it feel a little buzzy at 100 kph, although it smooths out by 120. Economy very good, 38.5 MPG (7.5 l/100Km), without trying too hard to be economical. Overtaking is not a problem, plenty of grunt.

Pressing on through the twisties, the steering loads up dramatically, and handling is nowhere as composed as, say, a good Euro hatch. It does its best to dissuade pushing hard.

General comments: Plain inside, but nice dash and white-faced dials. Column stalks have a smooth, quality feel. Seats themselves are comfortable, but the driving position is not tailored to taller people. Rear-seat folding is excellent; just as well, because the boot is smaller than you might expect (only 270 litres). Build quality excellent; looking closely in, around and under, there is nothing remotely dodgy about the design and build. There's even a cabin filter for the ventilation system.

Minimal maintenance, thanks to chain-driven cams, hydraulic lifters, no distributor. Combined with excellent fuel economy, and proven reliability, running costs are low.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th January, 2013

2005 Toyota Corolla Hatch 1.8

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2012
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 1.8 Automatic
Distance when acquired86000 miles
Most recent distance88000 miles
Previous carToyota Corolla

Summary:

Absurd engineering!

Faults:

Toyota's philosophy of "even though it's good, why not try to improve it" should be re- termed "if it ain't broken... Leave it alone!"

I am very disappointed with aspects of my latest Corolla.

To replace a rear brake or indicator light, requires one to dislodge the light holder from the top to bottom, then extract a festoon type of bulb through a ridiculously small entry portal with the smallest of hands of a midget! What an improvement! (my son's similar car had a festoon globe fall into the lens itself - requiring an hour's work to remove half the boot fittings to remove the light fitting - to extract the bulb! Great Toyota!)

Then I needed to install a tow bar for a light trailer!

Wow. What an improvement in design. First I had to physically cut off a piece of the number bar tabs, then remove all the boot lining, followed by removal of the bumper bar itself, and then insert a tapped bracket for the front bolt hole fixer inside the chassis subframe. Great design work Toyota! - not... Why not machine a proper threaded hole as per the others? Derr!

Then there is the issue of the wiring for the tow bar! What a nightmare. With the crazy wiring colour and non-compatibility of standard stop/ tail light arrangements of most trailers, one requires a 'converter module' or Toyota loom. Great, except that in Australia they no longer stock the loom as it is "too old"!!!

And the 'converter module' items are nowhere to be found.

I can't believe that the trusted simplicity of Toyotas has been distorted to such lunacy!

Then there is the craziness of the "wiring loom" that was available for the same model Corolla, differs from the sedan to the hatch. Really brilliant!!!

Damien Curry.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 30th September, 2012

2005 Toyota Corolla Conquest Sedan 1.8 petrol

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.8 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.3 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance37000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Corolla

Summary:

Quite alright for its intended purpose

Faults:

* A/C died in March 2006. Apparently a plug in the wire harness worked loose, error during prepurchase installation in Australia. A/C died again during November 2006. What apparently happened is that the first time the A/C died, they put more refrigerant in when it wasn't required, so it caused problems when the weather heated up again. Had to get the car back to a dealer twice in November to get the problem rectified, I basically had to tell them repeatedly to change the refrigerant, which they did, and that has solved the problem. I felt that from these experiences that Toyota needs to look at their after-market service BADLY!!

*General squeaks and rattles, these come and go, whilst they first arose at 1000km, I just live with them, I got used to it. Everything still works...

*side of driver's contoured sports bucket seat is wearing badly. Have installed throw-over seat covers to stop this.

*instrument panel lens that covers the speedometer etc. is badly scratched from cleaning. Will address at 40,000km service.

General Comments:

*OK on fuel - 10L/100km around town, 6.8 or so on highway.

*Interior was a little drab so I got some parts painted silver a la the Levin trim grade.

*Handles well, has high dynamic limits, due to good tyres. Ride could be better, though, nothing like, say, a focus. Steering 'feel' is a bit wooden, but basically OK.

*White paint masks minor scratches well.

*Engine performance good for its intended purpose, though needs the boot down up hills and when overtaking. Exhaust note mildly entertaining.

*Transmission well matched to engine, fairly smooth, better than my brothers Mazda 323 Astina.

*Huge boot, my 185cm brother fits in the back.

*Looks better now that I colour coded certain black trim parts and mudflaps.

*Easy to get in and out of, kinda high off the ground for a small car. Good ground clearance for unsealed roads.

*Plenty of storage space.

*I thought the stereo was of poor quality. Changed for an aftermarket system, much better.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 5th January, 2007

10th Jan 2009, 03:06

I completely agree, mine has a rattle type noise every now and then from somewhere behind the dash, that appeared some time after 1000km, I have searched high and low but cannot find (and I'm a mechanic...), now have what sounds like a noisy suspension spring from front left, but I'm learning to live with it :)

The vehicle is very easy to work on, I haven't needed to do the clutch yet, but your normal service items are really easy to do.

I found with city driving I generally get 10L per 100km, but I tend to accelerate a little hard at times ;), my best on highway (driving from just south of Brisbane to Sydney, I live in Sydney) I got 815km from 48 litres (for the curious, that's the movie world exit to F3 south bound, which is just south of Newcastle), which equates to 5.88L per 100km. Also this reminds me, my fuel light comes on when I still have at least 15L of fuel still in take, I have found that I can get the needle to the middle horizontal line on the "E", I wouldn't risk it any further than that.

Also induction/Eng revving noise is great on accelerating esp hard, but for better noise, drill a few holes (a few holes using a 38mm hole saw) in the air-box BEFORE THE AIR-FILTER (or to put it more simply, in the plastic below the airfilter, not in the filter, or in the plastic above it, and not in the rubber), or maybe try a POD filter (I haven't done that... yet). Eng (standard) noise is a bit high on highway, but you get used to it, also that's why it was a CD player isn't it?

But other than that, the car has been very reliable, I'm only now replacing a globe (the one that illuminates the rear window defogger), and it's the only non-service item I've replaced, and I have had the car from new, since about June 2005.

2005 Toyota Corolla Accent 1.8

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 1.8 Automatic
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.0 / 10
Distance when acquired5 kilometres
Most recent distance22000 kilometres
Previous carMazda 929

Summary:

Solid buy for a small family

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car. It performed exactly how you would expect a Toyota should.

General Comments:

This car is an Automatic and is not near as good as the manual.

I had an accident in it and was surprised to see that there was very little damage to it.

Finish is not anywhere near as good as the Japanese version of the car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 22nd October, 2006

26th Oct 2006, 04:07

But your car was built in Japan. Corolla's haven't been built in Australia/New Zealand since the late 1990's.

29th Feb 2008, 05:33

Some people just haven't got no clue about cars.

24th Mar 2009, 23:44

Aren't most of the Australian one's built in South Africa?

Average review marks: 7.1 / 10, based on 4 reviews