Mercedes-Benz C-Class Reviews from Belgium

2000 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Avantgarde 220 CDI

Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 220 CDI Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired2000 kilometres
Most recent distance72000 kilometres
Previous carMazda 626

Summary:

This one's a keeper

Faults:

This was a dealer demonstration car, and was one of the first of the new W203 series with the peanut headlights.

When it was delivered, the alarm had been disconnected (on purpose), there was a problem with the radio/phone interface that required new software, and the passenger door fitted badly.

Since then, 2 or 3 rear brake or tail lights have blown. If a tail light fails, the car will turn the brake light on at low intensity to replace it.

A front tyre was punctured by a large nail and blew out on the motorway. It took me a while to realise what had happened, since there was no steering pull, and the cruise control compensated for the drag.

Unfortunately the car had the tirefit system, and the bottle of sealant had gone hard, so we had to call for a tow truck.

General Comments:

This has been a very reliable, economic and comfortable car. Plenty of power and a very smooth automatic gearbox.

This model has slightly firmer suspension for better corning without sacrificing too much comfort.

It has just had its 3rd Service at 72000Km, about 45000 miles. The first two cost about 250 EUR each, but the last one cost 900 EUR because of the extra parts. Even so, the total servicing costs have been less than for the other new cars I have owned.

It holds it value very well, and I don't have the itch to trade it in. The Mazdas and Opels I used to own always looked old after a couple of years and I used to spend a fortune keeping them up to date.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th November, 2003

1997 Mercedes-Benz C-Class 220 classic diesel

Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission diesel Manual
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.6 / 10
Distance when acquired50000 kilometres
Most recent distance115000 kilometres
Previous carHonda Aerodeck

Summary:

Practical

Faults:

Bulb behind speedo.

Cloth seats don't clean well after kid's have spilled loads of food etc...

(maybe no surprise there though)

Air-con fault via hose not being connected properly by passenger seat, leading to pools of water around the floor of the back-seat!

General Comments:

The car is excellent for general use for my family (3 kids) being an estate it has good space for long journeys and although a classic model, comes with air-con.

As the model is a non-turbo diesel, performance is really poor except when upto speed on the motorway. The must have auto. box would be disadvantage with this engine, as at least the engine is not sapped, especially at junctions etc..

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd October, 2003

1998 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Classic 2.2 CDI

Year of manufacture1998
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 2.2 CDI Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.4 / 10
Distance when acquired17000 kilometres
Most recent distance56000 kilometres
Previous carNissan Bluebird

Faults:

My head gasket blew at 115.000km.

No other problems. It was a perfect car, just once it let me down in 12 years!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th May, 2001

Average review marks: 8.1 / 10, based on 3 reviews