2003 Toyota Previa Linea Sol 2.4 petrol

Summary:

Big and comfy, but watch out for rust!

Faults:

Bought the car with the following problems:

- Alternator was shot

- Coolant pump leaking

- Front left brake caliper partially seized

- Sliding doors hard to open from outside

- Driver's seat worn and torn

- Rust on the underside

Within one year the rear lock also started playing up. Other than that, all electrics, engine and gearbox worked without a hiccup.

General Comments:

Smooth and comfy, with plenty of room for, in my case, six passengers.

The engine is strong and smooth, and if driven sensibly, not as awfully thirsty as some reviews lead you to believe. Average fuel consumption was about 12 l/100 km. Also, easier to service than expected. The gearbox was also smooth, but a fifth gear is certainly missed, as the car gets noisy at speed.

The interior is your typical 90s Toyota - a sea of hard, gray plastic, but felt solid, apart from a few squeaks when idling. The rear seats are a bit finicky to get in and out and only the second row has ISOFIX, but they also fit the third row. So, if you do not believe in birth control, you can buy two more at the scrapper and have 4.

All in all a good, comfortable, hugely practical and generally reliable car.

BUT, watch out for rust! I knew it had some rust when I bought it, but within a year the rear sills were so badly rotten, I could not even lift it to change the tires! Body panels are only available from Toyota and cost a fortune. Ultimately, that was the reason I sold it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 17th November, 2019

17th Nov 2019, 19:34

Japanese car makers make reliable cars, but they have never shaken their reputation they have had since the 60s/70s for bad rust. Every Japanese car I have had has had rust problems at less than 10 years old, which is unacceptable in this day and age.

20th Dec 2019, 12:08

OP here. Ironically, from the 4 Toyotas I have had, the least problematic rustwise was also the oldest - a 1992 Celica, which I sold in 2013 without a single hole in it.

21st Dec 2019, 18:13

Depends on the time period as well. I think the 1990s was the best time. An elderly neighbour of mine has a 1997 Toyota Avensis that is still going strong with little to no rust. Whereas you see some mid 2000's era Japanese cars with terrible rust, mostly Mazda's I might add. Shame really, as they are otherwise decent cars.

1992 Toyota Previa GL 2.4

Summary:

The most reliable car I ever heard of

Faults:

Both catalysers (each 2000 DEM) were changed at 200.000 km.

Front brakes (disc) were changed at 240.000 km.

Alternator.

All pumps are still original.

Car never let me down - now show me one other car with the same performance at these kilometers!!

General Comments:

It is true that the car is mainly driven on highways, but I am still very surprised at the real quality of Toyota cars. It is not very nice, it is not quiet, it does not have the best seats, the interior is very "plastic", BUT it is extremely reliable, the whole car is very well built - quality, and nevertheless it has a lot of space - not like the other vans (too little space in the back when six people are in them).

I had always thought the most reliable and best built cars were made in Germany (BMW, Mercedes, Audi), but my experiences with Japanese cars (Toyota, Honda, Nissan) and my experience with the Previa at 340000 km changed my beliefs!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th November, 2000

13th Dec 2000, 15:55

You are totally right, I had same experiences with a Previa!!

29th Jul 2001, 22:47

I was the owner of a 1985 Toyota van. Had 114,000 miles on it when purchased. Figured I could get a couple of years out of it. Had 232,000 miles on it when I sold it 9 or 10 years later! Great vehicle! Plan on getting another one.