Mitsubishi Lancer Reviews from Israel

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Invite 1.5 petrol

Model year2010
Year of manufacture2010
First year of ownership2012
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 1.5 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired37000 kilometres
Most recent distance50000 kilometres
Previous carChevrolet Malibu

Faults:

Nothing yet, but I hear a rattling when the car is cold in the morning.

General Comments:

The car is very economical; on a full tank I can drive 650km.

In terms of performance, it is faster than its competitors, like the Mazda 3 and Toyota Corolla.

The driving visibility in this car is amazing; the side mirrors are large and efficient.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st March, 2012

1990 Mitsubishi Lancer GLX 1.5 petrol

Model year1990
Year of manufacture1990
First year of ownership1993
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.5 petrol Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Most recent distance284000 kilometres
Previous carn/a n/a

Summary:

Reliable and comfortable timeless car

Faults:

The power windows go's off power at same points and the after 16 years the suspension is starting to make bad noises when when the wheel is at full stir.

But it doesn't reflect any of the car driving parts.

General Comments:

Truly a car for life.

When treated, she can obtain a normal person life span, and after 17 years she's still good to to get you all excited about driving like it's a new car.

Thumbs up!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 25th January, 2007

1992 Mitsubishi Lancer GLX 1.5 petrol

Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 1.5 petrol Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.5 / 10
Distance when acquired128000 kilometres
Most recent distance128300 kilometres
Previous carRenault Express

Summary:

Excellent value

Faults:

Previous owner had skimped on the servicing, so a full service was needed.

We also replaced all the brake discs.

Apart from that there were just trivial things like a creaking clutch pedal, and a loose door trim.

General Comments:

Having been made redundant recently, I needed a cheap, reliable car, in great condition - but one with reasonable level of "comfort" features. I suppose that's the holy grail of all used-car buyers. But the Lancer I picked up really does meet all the criteria.

It cost me the equivalent of 2,100 quid, and I've spent another 200 or so on rectifying the little niggles: it is a ten year old car after all!

One thing that surprised me about this car is the huge amount of room in the engine compartment. My favourite mechanic says it's great to work on. Praise indeed.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 31st December, 2002

1992 Mitsubishi Lancer GLX 1.5 petrol

Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership1992
Most recent year of ownership1997
Engine and transmission 1.5 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance33000 kilometres
Previous carRover - Austin Montego

Summary:

Nobody should buy a Lancer

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

I really hate this car!

It is so uncomfortable!!!!!

It is cramped, you can't see anything from the small high rear window, and the fuel consumption is high.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 23rd June, 2000

6th Jan 2001, 14:30

The high fuel usage could be because it'san automatic, I've got a GTI 16v which returns about 25MPG.

22nd Jan 2001, 07:14

Mine: it consumes one litre every 8 km, city driving with no A/C powered on, it is automatic.

Average review marks: 7.4 / 10, based on 4 reviews