1987 BMW 3 Series 325

Summary:

A beautiful car for a great price.

Faults:

Had to replace main computer unit upon purchasing car. Was an expensive repair, but purchase price was adjusted to allow for cost of repair.

Coolant "check light" is always on. Have been told that it is a common wiring problem from that year.

Also had minor wiring problem with lights and signals (burned out bulbs and fast turn signal).

Replaced steering rack at 115000 miles.

General Comments:

This car has been the best car (and the oldest) I have owned. Handles great, has a nice zip and has never left me stranded.

Both the interior and the exterior are in excellent condition. I feel as if I have been sent back in time to 1987 driving around in a brand new bmw!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th June, 2001

21st Jun 2001, 11:45

To this guy with the North America BMW 325, I would like to email you about my car, I too have a 325 1987 and have had many problems with the coolant light and wiring problems. Please inform me of a way to contact you.

Thank you

--Nick.

1987 BMW 3 Series 325 2.6L inline 6

Summary:

Fun and reliable! But betrays you during a rear end collision!!!!

Faults:

The master cylinder needed to be replaced ($240).

Some electrical problems surfaced but eventually went away with the addition of new fuses.

Didn't collapse when I was rear ended, I absorbed most of the shock and it hurt like hell.

Parts are expensive, a new clutch is almost $500.

General Comments:

This is a great car. Extremely reliable, fun to drive, and very fuel efficient. For it's high mileage of 183,000 (from the Earth to the Moon) the engine doesn't burn oil, nor back-fire, nor stall.

Very well built. Even at 100 miles per hour the car doesn't rattle nor swerve. At any speed it hugs the road and makes normal conversation possible without yelling.

The only problem is that this car doesn't collapse "easily" during a collision. I was rear ended a few days ago by a 2001 Lexus LS 300. It was a very hard hit. The Lexus did what it was designed to do; it absorbed the shock and crumbled to protect its driver (about $5000 damage). My car on the other hand directed the force of the collision on to me and IT HURT LIKE HELL! I suffered a neck injury and the Beemer only suffered a bent exhaust and a few scratches. Not even the lights were broken.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th March, 2001

7th Feb 2002, 19:50

Yeah... I needed a new clutch on my 87 325i and it cost me almost $900... expensive, but I love the car.

10th Jan 2006, 02:01

The harshness of the impact wasn't because your Bimmer didn't "collapse." The real reason for the severe impact is that the other car necessarily "dove" down (like a duck into water) before rear-ending you, after he slammed on the brakes. This also explains why the taillights weren't damaged. In such an event, the car that does the rear-ending usually suffers the brunt of the damage, while the car that is hit (you) has little damage, but a huge force that travels through the frame and into your body. This is why neck injuries are common in these situations.

Trust me, I would know. I've rear-ended two people in the past couple years, and besides I'm also a claims adjuster. I analyzed this stuff for a living. LOL.

1987 BMW 3 Series 325 2.6L V6

Summary:

A good economic performer with class

Faults:

Original exhaust replaced around 180,000 miles.

Transmission rebuilt around 215,000 miles.

Lower control arms now need replacing.

Air conditioning went out around 220,000 - I never investigated the cause (might be minor).

Other small misc (to-be-expected) items replaced as well as preventive maintenance.

Gasket at the oil pan has small oil leak.

Electronic module (ignition related) - I got a used replacement for less than $50.

General Comments:

This has been a GREAT car! I still prefer driving it to my wife's 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse. It handles better and is just about as fast (maybe more on the top end).

The interior is well designed except for the lack of tilt steering wheel and no air bag (was optional in 1987).

Very low maintenance required (until around 200,000) and the engine still runs strong.

Original black paint looks great with 2 small spots (smaller than a dime) of corrosion around the rear license plate lights.

Car stranded me one time in my 11 years of ownership (due to an electronic module).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th February, 2001

16th Oct 2002, 21:23

The 325i has a 2.5 liter straight 6.

16th Aug 2004, 16:54

If he has a 325 (not 325i), it's a 2.7 liter I6 just like in the "e" and "es". The "i" and "is" were 2.5, as you said, and all were inline sixes.

1987 BMW 3 Series 325 2.6L inline six

Summary:

Excellent. Wise investment

Faults:

Gas and temperature gauge ceased working.

Front left visor broke.

Air conditioner doesn't work.

General Comments:

This car handles great. It is very reliable and comfortable. It's amazing that a car with that mileage still runs better than an Oldsmobile with much lower mileage.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 3rd February, 2001

12th May 2002, 20:22

Have you found the cause of the guages not working? How did you fix them? I have the same problem with mine.

1987 BMW 3 Series 325 2.6 Liter inline six

Summary:

A good looking reliable bargain

Faults:

The signals and lights burn out constantly.

There is also a prevalent problem with blown exhaust gaskets.

Otherwise, the car is great and very reliable.

General Comments:

The car is not very fast at all, and I spend a lot of money on it just to get it to compete with standard Japanese cars. However, I love the body style and the interior, and the car was very easy to acquire parts for.

It handled great and had decent top end power, but was lacking in the shifting and braking departments.

All in all, the car was great though. Overall, I would give it an 8.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd November, 2000