1995 Chevrolet Camaro 3.7L V6

Summary:

V6 engine 4 banger power

Faults:

Exhast needed replacement soon after I bought it.

Heat leaks, havent fixed it yet.

Just about idle there is a small vibration, dealer told me I have a crank bearing that has to much wear.

General Comments:

Don't get me wrong I like this car, it handles well, but is to slow for me. My old s10/v6 was faster and got the same gas mileage. And in the winters here in anchorage, Alaska this thing doesn't do well. I wish I had looked harder for the v8 models.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 10th March, 2003

1995 Chevrolet Camaro 3.4L V6

Summary:

A fun car for a good price.

Faults:

I had a brake caliper bind up and caused uneven wear on the driver's side rotor and brake pad. This was fixed with a complete front brake job performed in my grandpa's garage for only $150.

The seats do show slight wear marks on the outside bolster of both seats.

The car got jumped on this winter by another Camaro that jumped a curb.

General Comments:

The car is a great bargain and I would not pass another one up.

Though the car is quick for a V-6 and will keep up with, if not beat most other cars on the road, I leave you wanting a Z-28.

You notice that at every bump the car sounds like it is falling apart, mostly because most of the car is plastic.

The handling of the car is great with wide tires that will grip turns at most any speed.

The interior in the front is roomy, yet the backseat passengers don't have much room to move.

The only practical use for the hatch is storage of the T-tops, which are my favorite feature.

Most importantly, the car turns a lot of heads, especially with the T-tops out and the stock Bose CD player pounding out the music.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th March, 2003

14th Nov 2004, 23:11

There is no 1995 Z28 V6...only V8's were Z28s.

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 LT1

Summary:

A great car to any Speed enthusiast

Faults:

There is a squeak in a clutch when you let it out. It is due to the original owner before me who always let off the clutch sliding his foot off. A little grease will take care of that.

General Comments:

I really enjoy this car. Stock this car has 275 horsepower. Right now the car is pumping close to 320 horsepower with a Borla catback exhaust, K&N cold air intake and a RK Sport Coil. It also has cross drilled rotors, Momo shift knob, Neons all the way around and tint. This car is extremely fast, but I can use a little more power.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th September, 2002

1st Feb 2004, 01:57

No way you'll have 320 with just those mods... products always overstate their hp potentials...

8th Mar 2004, 18:52

I agree, it is impossible to get that much horsepower from such simple mods.

8th Mar 2004, 20:42

No way a cat back, K+N and ignition gave you 45 hp increase. The Biggest restrictor on the exhaust is the catalytic converter, cat back is more for show then go, maybe 10 hp, the K+N is nice, but without the exhaust being substantially better the intake can only match the intake, maybe 10 hp. New ignition, more efficient spark, more efficient combustion, but not a huge power increase, maybe 5 hp increase. Add it up 25 horse, put it on a Dyno and I bet your at or under 300 horse.

22nd Feb 2005, 10:42

Yea that's a pretty lame list of mods, you're under 300 horses.

20th Jun 2010, 13:48

The converter is not the most restrictive part of the exhaust, the manifolds are. The stock intake and catback on these cars are very restrictive, I would know as I own a 95 Z of my own. Maybe this guy isn't putting out 320 like he says, but it's not unreasonable to think that he could be in the 300 hp area.

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Coupe 3.8 V6

Summary:

The Legend Lives..

Faults:

Transmission warning light came on around 70K miles, replaced transmission before slippage could become noticeable..

General Comments:

Surprisingly potent V-6 power and excellent handling and cornering ability.

Not the most comfortable on long trips.

Visual appeal is unmatched by anything else in the GM stable.

Excellent buy for those of us who cannot afford the high insurance/maintenence costs of the Z28 or SS.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th July, 2002

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7L

Summary:

A race car in a street package

Faults:

Overall, nothing at all. Clutch was replaced at 114000 miles. Every LT1 motor I've come across has had an rear intake manifold oil leak around 100000 miles. I repaired it myself and saved about $600. Parts for the repair cost about $60. Dash has a couple of impossible to find rattles.

General Comments:

I've put about $2000 in the car in just performance modifications. Currently, it's got headers, a 104mm throttle body, cold air induction, exhaust, and short throw shifter. It's amazing what this car can do. I've dusted Corvette after Corvette, Trans Am after Trans Am, Cobra after Cobra. It runs like new to this day.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th April, 2002

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 350 LT-1

Summary:

A high-performance road rocket

Faults:

Air Pump went bad (and subsequently had refund due to recall campaign)

General Comments:

This car is a beast. Out of the box it's got approx 260 rear-wheel horsepower, with about $500USD simple mods I'm up closer to 300.

The car suffers from minor irritating rattles and shakes in the dash - but these are well known and easily dealt with.

The handling is really good, and can be made easily better with simple bolt-on parts. Traction at wide open throttle could be better, but you've got a lot of power to deal with.

As a commuter car (As I've used this for, mostly) you'll have to deal with road noise and sometimes kidney-bruising ride. Traction in the wet can be a problem, but is alleviated with a good set of all-weather tires.

The T-Tops are a must have - nothing like cruising in a nice fast car with the tops out... without the hassle of convertible tops.

I love this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st June, 2001