1996 Chevrolet Camaro Sport Coupe 3.8

Summary:

Sporty and reliable daily driver

Faults:

At 110,000 miles, the water pump failed.

An exhaust pipe rattled a little, but the shop adjusted it for free.

General Comments:

My Camaro came equipped with T-tops, a leather steering wheel, and all the power options. From the outside, and the inside, it looks a lot like a Z28 minus the badges. Runs on regular 87 octane fuel, and gets 30 miles per gallon on the highway. Acceleration, handling, and braking are crisp and responsive. Wet weather traction isn't the greatest, but it is predictable. The ride is smooth, and relatively quiet. Controls are logically placed, and the driver's seat is comfortable for my 6'2" frame. Great car for interstate driving. For the past year, I have commuted 50 miles per day, and the car has held up well.

Compares well with the Celica and the Prelude (both of which were too small for me).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th May, 2008

3rd Mar 2012, 21:31

Update:

This vehicle now has over 200,000 miles on the clock. It's still running great with the original motor, original transmission, original shock absorbers, and even the original exhaust.

I did replace the rear end at about 195,000 miles, because it was getting a little noisy, and I opted to replace the original radiator hoses because they were old, but that was basically preventative maintenance.

It still starts on the first try, takes me wherever I want to go without leaving me stranded, and looks good doing it. More reliable than my coworkers' Japanese cars, despite the fact that it's much older.

Gets lots of compliments on the style, performance for a V6, and how clean it looks for its age. The original paint still shines, the SMC body panels are of course ding free, and the seats are holding up very well. No rips or tears yet, even on the driver's side bolster closest to the door where these cars usually show wear.

With an aftermarket intake, I've managed to get up to 34 mpg on the highway. That said, this car is a lot of fun. I drove the Tail of the Dragon (Deals Gap) in 2010, and lately I've even taken it to a few local car meets and shows. Not bad. The longer I own it, the more I like it.

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 3.8L V6

Summary:

Fun to drive when it's not broken

Faults:

The car has had the following problems since I've owned it:

Alternator

Starter

Water pump

Heat

Ignition coil

ABS

A/C

Tie rods

Leaks coolant and oil

General Comments:

Besides breaking all the time, the car is fun to drive, even though it is not all that powerful.

The interior is comfortable as long as you are in the driver's seat. The passenger has a big bump in the floor from the catalytic converter, and the back seats are tiny.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 23rd January, 2008

1996 Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.8L

Summary:

Sexy car with expensive parts

Faults:

Got my beautiful green 'maro at 180,000km. At 185 the transmission blew...

Had to replace 2 coil packs in the span of 1 month.

Windshield wipers from the factory were $50 a piece.

Windshield wiper arm broke in half, $80 part.

Oil was leaking into the coolant which meant new intake manifold, so I decided to sell it.

General Comments:

Beautiful sports car, mine had leather and t-roof. Had complements all the time. V6 provided decent power and decent gas mileage. Parts for the car were very expensive. Make sure if you buy an automatic with higher mileage that it has a rebuilt tranny.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 11th March, 2007

1996 Chevrolet Camaro RS V6

Summary:

Its speed will surprise you

Faults:

The Clutch went out at about 128000 miles.

This is most likely due to incorrect operation of prior owner.

General Comments:

This car is without a doubt the most bang for your buck out of any "small" sports car.

It easily out powers any car in its class, and has a significant amount more power than any v-6 I have ever driven.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th May, 2006