2001 Honda Accord LX V6

Summary:

Buy one and you'll never go back to any other manufacturer

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with this car. Same as my '93 Accord which now has 130,000 miles on it.

General Comments:

Car is well worth the money if you want a reliable, very well built (outstanding fit and finish) auto with high safety ratings.

V6 is much better than the 4 cyl model for power needed on the highways.

Interior is well designed, seats are very comfortable and the premium sound system that comes standard can't be improved upon.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th January, 2002

16th Jan 2002, 16:17

Buy one and you'll wish you wouldn't have.

19th Jan 2002, 10:14

It seems to me from reading the Accord reviews, that Hondas (and Toyotas etc) that are built in America, are inferior to the ones that leave Japanese and English factories. I've been quite surprised at the number of negative comments regarding US Hondas. I expected much fewer!

2001 Honda Accord EX-VL 3.0 V6

Summary:

Another engineering marvel expected from Honda

Faults:

Nothing major has gone wrong with the car. I believe Honda builds cars that are meant to last. I have had my Accord into be serviced once in 7500 miles.

The cup holder assembly in the middle console broke.

Door lock trim pieces on the back 2 doors kept popping up.

A gasket on the top of the windshield had to be replaced. It wasn't leaking, it just needed to be replaced for cosmetic reasons.

Other than that, there have been no problems whatsoever, and I don't think it is fair to criticize Honda for these small-one-time fixes.

General Comments:

Overall I would say "Buy a Honda without hesitation". However, there are a couple of things that I was surprised about after purchasing their fully loaded EX-V6 model:

Engine power is awesome. Great, subtle, but ever-present torque growl. With this power be prepared to fill it up. I average between 15 and 18 mpg in heavy city driving; 19-22 on the highway.

Under heavy acceleration noticeable torque-steer is present, not enough to pull you out of your lane, but it is there.

Seats, suspension, tires, and visibility are fantastic.

Transmission shifts fluidly, easily forgotten performance.

Ample lighting of the roadway, optional fog lights really fill in the gaps.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 30th July, 2001

3rd Aug 2002, 19:37

I have the same car, without the fog-lights. Agree with all the comments on the review -- and I'm at 55,000 miles and climbing.

Only two issues with my car --- both serious : (

First -- having recurring problem with my EGR valve. Its been cleaned twice, replaced once, and the check engine light is back on. Appears this is a common, but not well understood, problem.

Second -- my CD Player "died" --- the reader codes outs @ "PEO". Checking the 'net indicates that this is also "common"; and costs about $150US to repair. I think I'll add a 6-CD APINE changer to the car instead. This is set to work with the OEM head-unit and controls; and will provide 6x the # of CDs.

20th Sep 2002, 07:56

The 2001 is a great smooth-riding car. There is ample room and the whole 9 yards!! Only thing I found was that the rotors warp easily. This is a serious issue. Does anyone else have that problem?

20th May 2004, 15:32

My mom's car (see "great car for commuting singles") has a little vibration while braking, probably a bent rotor as you were saying. I'm afraid to bring it up to her because I know what she'll say, "I just had it serviced, it doesn't need anything."

27th Oct 2006, 22:14

I have had 3 honda accords so far. They are very reliable, but...

1. To get long life from them, you should use only honda fluids, which are more expensive than generic fluids.

2. When the car does need service, parts are very expensive.

3. Despite their reputation for reliability, they are by no means rugged or bullet proof. In fact, they can be very fragile. Hard driving or other abuse can easily cause breakage and reduce it's life.

4. Honda still cannot produce a good automatic transmission. They do not shift optimally and frequently fail prematurely.

5. The Michelin tires honda insists on putting on their cars are horrible. Almost any other brand will give you a 100% better ride.

28th Oct 2006, 21:14

I think the new 5-speed auto is a nice tranny. I drive my 94 Accord hard and have gotten 242,000 miles without any problems at all.

2001 Honda Accord EX V6

Summary:

Great value for the money

Faults:

I have experienced no difficulties yet.

General Comments:

I just picked the car up yesterday and I LOVE IT! Inside, it is very comfortable and has lots of amenities that you wouldn't find on a similar priced car.

Outside is attractive, but pretty conventional. I had looked at the Jetta and think it is a much better looking car. However, for the money, the Honda offered considerably more in all categories. Driving the Jetta was like driving a pickup truck without power steering. The Honda drives very smoothly. I'm very pleased with my decision so far.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th July, 2001

18th Mar 2005, 20:23

First of all, the Jetta is far superior to any Honda. If it drove like a pickup, either that is one sporty truck, or the car you drove was not a Jetta. Second, there is no way to make an accurate prediction of reliability and satisfaction so soon. No car should ever give you problems at one day old. Don't get me wrong. Hondas are fine cars, but consider this: It would take you less than three hours at 60 miles per hour to drive the distance you had your Accord at the time you wrote your article. If you are going to write a credible review, you should wait until your car is at least a year old. That way, you can be sure of your review's accuracy.