1994 Jaguar XJ40 Reviews from North America

1994 Jaguar XJ40 XJ12 6.0 V12

Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 6.0 V12 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired68000 miles
Most recent distance124000 miles
Previous carJaguar XJ6

Summary:

A great car... but not for the faint of wallet

Faults:

Part Failures: Transmission Seal, Oxygen Sensor (3 times), Air Pump, Rear Shocks (2 times), Engine Mount, Front Suspension Subframe Mounts, Front and Rear Shock Bushings, Front Anti-Roll Bar Bushing, Front Balljoints, Window Switch, Low Coolant Warning Sensor, Ignition Coil, Electric Seat Control, Radio/Tuner.

The car's suspension is obviously under-designed for the added weight of the V12 and the poor quality of US roads. The car has required replacement of suspension components that have failed or worn at a rate that is simply disgraceful. (I haven't totaled the suspension repair costs, but it is surely excessive) Particularly awful was replacement of bushings for the front suspension subframe. This is attached at three points, and two bushings were completely destroyed through normal use. This procedure was $2,000+. The heat from the exhaust pipes also appears to damage the rear shock absorbers at regular intervals.

The seal at the rear-most of the transmission was similarly baked by heat, and appears to be the one weak link in an otherwise fantastic and robust transmission.

The oxygen sensors have been replaced often; it seems they are just prone to failure (but they are not cheap).

The engine coil failed completely and without warning, stranding the car.

There are some interior trim noises over washboard surfaces and rough roads; more than expected considering the mileage and initial cost of the car. (The interior of my friend's 911 with 170,000 feels much better bolted together.) Also, the light cream color of the leather is unfortunate: it shows up marks and wears far to easily.

In 1994, JD Power rated Jags 5th in initial quality, which was a factor in my buying decision. I think, however, my car has not given much credence to such a high quality rating. After 160,000 miles, my previous Series 3 XJ6 was far more reliable.

General Comments:

Aside from the heavy repair/maintenance bills and disappointments listed above, the car has been wonderful. The engine is simply incredible, and seems to be as strong as ever, even with the high mileage. In fact, the entire drivetrain has remained flawless. The gears shift with perfect ease, and the sensation is that of a solid link between engine and rear wheels, not the somewhat fluid, mushy feeling of the older V12 with 3-speed automatic.

Most Jaguars have a special feel, and the V12 is certainly among the best of all recent Jags. I even prefer it to the new V8. The firmer ride of the twelve is a great compromise between comfort and performance, and when pressing really hard it resists understeer incredibly well. In Colorado where I live, mountain driving really shows up weaknesses in a car, but the XJ12 is just excellent at high speed and under strenuous conditions. Climbing step hills at over 10,000 ft., where engine performance is severely tested, it will just fly past traffic, even in top gear. It just goes where you point it, and gives an amazing sense of security and comfort. The only sore spot is fuel economy, which definitely suffers when going hard.

Inside, the car is the right size, with excellent visibility. I have read complaints of wind noise on XJ40s, but mine seems to be about as silent as possible.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th January, 2003

28th Dec 2003, 23:41

Auto Emission Recalls on Jaguar XJ12 and XJS.

About 3,000 of the Jaguar XJS and XJ12 for model years 1994 and 1995 are being recalled for oxygen sensor circuit failure, a device that ensures the correct amount of fuel and air are burned when the engine is running.

1994 Jaguar XJ40 XJ12 6.0L V12

Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 6.0L V12 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired74000 miles
Most recent distance114000 miles
Previous carFord Crown Victoria

Summary:

Graceful performance sedan

Faults:

The air conditioning performance is not to great. It works well out on the road, but in town, especially sitting in a drive through, it does not blow very cold. I do have some very minor oil seepage here and there, but no leaks large enough to worry about.

General Comments:

I love this car! I have modified the air cleaners and installed K&N filters and now it does 0-60 in 6.33s and the quarter mile in 14.67@98mph. Not bad for a 4500 pound vehicle. The 6.0L V12 is a beautiful engine and the GM transmission shifts very good.

The ride height is very low and the car is very stable even at high speeds. It handles great!

Because the full-sized spare and battery mount in the trunk, there is not too much extra trunk space. It is satisfactory.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th September, 2002

20th Apr 2004, 21:21

This was my review for my car. I just wanted to add, the car now has 138k miles. I did have a few problems. I had to replace all the front suspension bushings, front shocks, and the radiator. However, the car drives great again. I now own a 1998 XJR too.

1st Jan 2005, 14:57

Can you compare your XJ12 and your XJR for us?? I'd love to hear the good and bad points of each in contrast, as both cars are incredible!!

Thanks.

Paul G.

Average review marks: 7.2 / 10, based on 2 reviews