1995 Jaguar XJR 4.0 supercharged

Summary:

The best hi-performance sedan/saloon that you can buy for under $10,000!

Faults:

Oil pressure sending unit fail; Reading 0 to low on the gauge. This is a common problem and can be fixed by installing a new (updated) oil pressure sending unit.

Transmission mount fail; Another common problem with Jags in general, resulting in a loud under car "thumping" sound when going over bumps (in worse case scenarios may result in damage to the transmission wiring harness/loom.

Spark plug coil (6); Failure/cracking resulting in mis-firing and poor gas-mileage. Expensive to replace new, though these can be easily repaired.

Supercharger belt tensioner failure; Resulted in loss of supercharger drive belt. A quick and relatively inexpensive fix.

General Comments:

Having owned several "Performance" BMW's and a couple of Mercedes, I'm knowledgeable of European sedans (Saloons).

The XJR is stunningly beautiful and gets compliments on a regular basis (Typical Jaguar mystique).

Once the above mentioned problems were sorted out, this car is a joy to own and drive. Handling is quick and responsive, and the supercharged 6-cylinder provides more than enough "punch".

What I enjoy most about this car is its refined and "gentlemanly" appearance, hiding muscle car performance.

This big cat can hunt down most highway predators and eat them alive!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 6th May, 2008

14th Feb 2010, 19:56

That's funny. My previous car was a 1998 740il. Talk about problems. The whole cooling system had to be replaced. Anyways, just bought a 1995 XJR, black on black. It is just a beautiful car. Let's say it looks good from every angle. Only problem is it will not pass emissions. It does run great, but it is running rich. Anyways, it is an incredible car and way undervalued! Good for me, as I bought it at a really low price.

1995 Jaguar XJR 4.0 6 Cylinder Supercharged

Summary:

If other examples are as good as mine I'd have rate a used XJR as "performance bargain of the year."

Faults:

Front wheel bearing failure due to lack of lubricant.

Interior lamp flickering due to dirty switch.

The "Memory" function of the seat works, but not quite correctly.

General Comments:

One of the best bargains on the used car market today. These mid-90s Jags are seriously undervalued.

This car is very powerful... not terrifyingly so, but lots of ooomph in any gear or at any road speed. You get quite a strong pushed-back-in-the-seat feeling when you tromp on it. This combined with the tight suspension and powerful brakes make this sedan more fun to drive than many would expect. The Jaguar styling is just icing on the cake.

In typical Jag fashion the car is quiet and comfortable although, being the short wheelbase model, the rear seat is a bit tight for space.

This is my third Jag and certainly the most enjoyable. After 5 months I've had no significant repair/reliability issues.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th November, 2006

12th Nov 2006, 20:46

One of my best friends ran an exclusive repair shop for Jags and other exotic cars, and he told me the newer ones are really great. Since Ford took over Jaguar it has lost its reputation as one of the world's most unreliable cars. It is now one of the best. Congrats on a great car.

1995 Jaguar XJR 4.0 supercharged inline 6

Summary:

Sporty and cheap to buy, but expensive to run

Faults:

Few major thing have gone wrong with the car, but that makes it almost more annoying, since the things that have gone wrong are with the electrics and other comfort items.

The heated seats no longer work and I haven't taken that in to be repaired.

The fan belt/supercharger belt spontaneously shredded itself, one day after a major dealer service. Their response? "Oh, we've been noticing that XJRs seem to run through their fanbelts more quickly". Maybe they should put a note in their system?

The clock no longer displays the time (it is an LCD display).

The exterior temperature gauge is often wrong by up to 7 or 8 degrees Celsius.

General Comments:

All in all, a good touring car. Gas consumption isn't good, but with 322hp, it wouldn't be.

Interior space is below par, with the back seats being roughly the same size as a Golf I had for a while.

I would recommend a later version of the XJR, post-1998 when the engine changed from the 6 cylinder to a V8. Reliability improved then and the interior was redesigned to a more modern look.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th May, 2004

1st Apr 2008, 13:20

Stick with a 96 or 97 XJR, the last two years of the extremely reliable real Jaguar 4.0 I6 supercharged engine. I owned a 93 XJ40 with that engine for four years and then purchased my 97 XJR6. The V8's were NOT anywhere near as reliable as they were aluminum Ford built engines. 1998 (first year with V8), 1999, & 2000 I advise staying away from. Look up the Nikasil issues on the Jaguar Forums site I'm part of. Complete engines and transmission were replaced on A LOT of those years far before hitting 100K miles. That's the reason those years are so cheap today, yes they're gorgeous with minor exterior tweaks compared to prior generation XJR but I don't recommend those years. Aim for a 2001-2003 before they were redesigned again. By those later years the timing chains/tensioners, and the Nikasil issues were resolved. My dad leased a used 2000 XJR and it was amazing but I'm glad we didn't buy it out at the end when it was around 75K miles. Just a word to the wise!

13th Jun 2008, 08:25

I have a 95 XJR and owned a 96. I love the inline 6 supercharged cars. I also own a 95 BMW 540. The Jag is a better built, although heavier car but more robust.

The neck snapping torque is nice too... and since my ABS / trac lock function shuts off at 15 mph, the car can lite em' up just fine.

The little things that break are annoying but the car is nice to look at and I consider it a modern classic Jag. The V8 cars are lumps in my book...LOL.

24th Jun 2008, 18:23

Which is quicker out of the two; the BMW or the Jag?