1997 Mazda 626 DX 2.0 gas

Summary:

The 626 is an overall good little car however; Mazda does not stand behind the emissions warrantee.

Faults:

Check Engine light came on 1 week after initial purchase. <50,000 miles.

I took the car back to the dealership where I purchased it and they in turn returned it to the Mazda dealer for repair. Looking back I now realize that the trouble code was simply cleared because the "check engine" light returned about 2 weeks later. The car was returned a second time (mileage still under 50,000) with the same results. The car was returned to me with no "check engine" light. The light returned in less than 2 weeks. I returned the car a third time, this time I was told that the check engine light would not hurt anything if the car was running well so I did not pursue it further.

When it became necessary to have the car's emissions inspected (as per Georgia law) the car failed because the "Check engine" light was on. This time I took the car directly to the Mazda dealership for advice and repair. I was told that the car needed a $600 catalytic converter. At this time the vehicle had 83,000 miles (3000 over the emissions warrantee period) and was told that Mazda North America would be unable to help with the repair leaving me with a car that would not pass the inspection. I had the trouble codes cleared and retested and passed however, the light returned after approximately 3 weeks and is still on today. I am happy with the car but not the way Mazda stands behind their product.

General Comments:

The Mazda is very comfortable to drive.

My 626 has never failed to start or operate.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 24th November, 2002

11th Jul 2003, 11:44

I'm now the owner of a 1997 GMC Jimmy that I really don't want... but ended up with as an emergency measure - having had my 1997 Mazda 626 LS transmission give out on me 2 days ago while on the way across an intersection headed for work.

I, too - have had the eternally on "check engine" light. The dealer checked it when it started around 46,000 miles. Said it's just one of those annoying things, but everything is fine. Years later, another mechanic at a repair shop said the same thing. 2 weeks ago, a mechanic said - just a short in the wiring from the O2 sensor which he disconnected.

I had brought it in 2 weeks ago, having heard a strange, faint scraping sound when starting up from a stoplight. He drove all over, heard the same sound, but said he couldn't find anything wrong. Well... it was the transmission.

Ironically, I had in fact read reviews (many many many highly negative reviews) a while back - tales of woe about the 1997 transmissions which tended to die at about 70,000 miles. I thought, seeing as I had 110,000 miles on my car, perhaps this won't happen to me.

No such luck.

Given the diagnosis and the potential cost of replacing the transmission (and I am SO SICK of hearing "oh, you oughtta go to my friend so-and-so who does trannies...it'll only cost ya $400 tops") - I had to wonder if this would be money well spent (=borrowed) and if this would just be the first in a line of financial woes & repairs... and opted to find a trade-in I could afford.

Bummer.

1997 Mazda 626 LX

Summary:

Good car if checks out OK

Faults:

My transmission went out at 49,000. I suggest when buying a Mazda to get the transmission checked before buying. it costs about $2,500. Also the check engine light. They are all signs of mechanical failure. I bought the car on a Friday and the next day the transmission went out. it is a beautiful car, but not when it is in the shop. I also suggest looking up the Vin number, it will tell you about when it was last checked, or if the dealer checked it also. Over all if those don't fail you, get the 626, but not from Dennis Dillon.

General Comments:

Transmission fails at 49,000.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 16th October, 2002

13th Nov 2003, 14:52

A mechanic told me that the Mazda Transmissions are known as 75,000 Mile Transmissions. If I was in your shoes I would sell your vehicle sooner rather than later. I myself Only drive Toyota or Honda.

1997 Mazda 626 LX V-6 2.5L V6

Summary:

An excellent, affordable sporty sedan

Faults:

The right front axle assembly was replaced under warranty.

The HVAC blower was replaced under warranty.

The left front axle assembly needs replacing.

General Comments:

The car is roomy, comfortable, very quick and good-looking.

It is well-equipped and has been generally quite reliable.

It rolls a bit too much in the corners, but is otherwise a blast to drive.

Dealership service has not been good, which is why I take it to a private mechanic.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th February, 2002

1997 Mazda 626 LX 2.5L V6

Summary:

Faster than you would think!

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with this car so far.

General Comments:

The car is very responsive, and has not caused me any problems. If you are in the market for this car, I would strongly recomend getting the V6 with the 5 speed manual transmission, because the automatic versions are not as responsive (as with any automatic!)

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th December, 2000

1997 Mazda 626 ES 2.5 liter V6

Faults:

3 major engine repairs, transmission adjusted / repaired 4 times, rear fender repaired twice, upholstery and trim repaired / replaced 3 times, engine firewall insulation replaced once.

General Comments:

Hhhmmmm.... in the shop once a week for about three months??? No question in my mind if I will ever buy another Mazda again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 7th March, 1999

25th Apr 2001, 03:15

Sorry to hear you were stuck with a bad car. I own a 93 626 Dx and runs great. Sometimes people just have ill luck with their cars no matter what brand they buy. I would've sold the car after the first 2 times to the shop for engine work. Keep in mind also, if it was purchased used, was it properly maintained, or was it used to race and so forth.