Nissan 100NX Reviews from North America

1990 Nissan 100NX

Model year1990
Year of manufacture1990
Engine and transmission Manual
Previous carHonda Civic

Summary:

Great car

Faults:

The only major job I had on this car was the clutch lining, which I think part of the the maintenance.

Other than that, it was perfect.

General Comments:

This car was the best car I'd ever had.

I had a brand new 1997 Honda Civic and the transmission broke down in just 3 weeks.

Then, before the fourth year, when you start the engine in the morning or whenever it's cold, you could hear the lifters so bad.

When I had this Nissan Pulsar, I was more confident than when I had the Honda Civic considering it was 1990.

Too bad I had to let it go due to the body was too rusty.

I had it for 5 years and I bought it in 1999.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 29th May, 2007

1991 Nissan 100NX 2.0 liter

Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0 liter Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired146052 miles
Most recent distance150000 miles
Previous carNissan 100NX

Summary:

A cheap as dirt, Head turner

Faults:

The rear deck gasket doesn't seal properly, causing exhaust to be sucked into the car.

The t-tops leak.

Center console hinge broken.

Something is wrong with the starter or wiring to/from the starter. The car only starts when it feels like it.

Seats show wear and tear easily.

General Comments:

Quick little car when it feels like it.

People never know what it is.

Head-turner, pretty little car.

Not all seats should be occupied by passengers, definitely not the rear drivers side.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th July, 2004

Average review marks: 6.8 / 10, based on 2 reviews