1992 Plymouth Duster Reviews from North America

1992 Plymouth Duster 3.0L

Model year1992
Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 3.0L Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired166000 kilometres
Most recent distance178000 kilometres

Summary:

Good car, but it's a piece of crap

Faults:

My timing belt snapped at 173000 kilometers, had blown the motor at the same time.

Just recently my pressure hose for the power steering was leaking bad. We fixed everything, but now the rack and pinion (steering box) is leaking just the same.

I thought it would be a good car to start with, but I rushed into buying a car and now I regret it because it always breaks down on me, and I'm only 18 years old, working part time. It sucks.

General Comments:

It's a good project car; if you like working on cars, this is the car to do it.

Runs good when it's running. It's quick, has power, good handling, roomy inside, very comfortable, fits 5 people, trunk space is quite good for the size.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 20th May, 2009

1992 Plymouth Duster 3.0L V6 ohc

Model year1992
Year of manufacture1992
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 3.0L V6 ohc Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired120000 miles
Most recent distance126930 miles
Previous carPlymouth Sundance

Summary:

Can you say

Faults:

The paint on the spoiler was faded when I got it, and I don't know when that went bad, but I got it repainted. That's all that's gone wrong so far.

General Comments:

This car is extremely quick, with the 5-speed it just dominates.

Handling's not the best, but it's better than some cars.

Inside is roomy for how small of a car it is.

Trunk space is adequate.

Mine's a two door and is probably the shortest car at school.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th September, 2004

Average review marks: 8.9 / 10, based on 2 reviews