1995 Plymouth Sundance Review from North America

1995 Plymouth Sundance Hatchback

Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership1994
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.4 / 10
Distance when acquired27000 miles
Most recent distance116000 miles
Previous carPontiac Sunfire

Summary:

A small reliable inexpensive car

Faults:

Timing belt slips.

Oxyegen sensor needs to be replaced.

Rewiring at 60,000 miles.

General Comments:

A very reliable car. It has run forever, with only minor maintince. It is durable, and wonderful.

I wish Chrysler didn't replace the Shadows and Sundances with the Neon.

Not much power.

Small for three people.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th January, 2003

2nd Mar 2004, 22:38

The last year sundance/Duster was made was 1994. Could not be a 95 model.

21st Jun 2004, 10:36

I had a 1992 Dodge Shadow 2-door. I loved the car. The reason I had to get rid of it was, the drivers door hinges were rusted to a point it would not stay shut. When going around a sharp curve, the door would fly open. I had to tie the door shut, with rope and get in and out from the passenger side. Now you might think this car looked like junk, but it didn't. When I gave it up it had 218,000 miles on it. Honest, original motor. I did have to replace the timing belt at 100,000, but that's all I ever did to it. When I traded it in, the Dodge dealership service manager bought it for himself, to put the motor in a sundance he had.

Average review marks: 6.4 / 10, based on 1 review