2003 Saturn VUE Reviews from North America

2003 Saturn VUE

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.3 / 10
Distance when acquired100000 kilometres
Most recent distance130000 kilometres
Previous carNissan Maxima

Summary:

Cheap disposable transportation

Faults:

Brakes always squeaked, mechanic said they were fine & fully functional, just never stopped squeaking.

Exhaust gasket impossible to fix, gave up after four trips to garage. Always sounded like a Harley.

Timing belt went at 130K, destroyed engine. The car is off to the wreckers.

General Comments:

Comfortable, if simple interior.

Air, CD, cruise. Lots of room. Loud cabin / road noise.

Cheap materials in institutional grey. Decent fuel economy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 24th June, 2012

25th Jun 2012, 10:57

Wow, a case of just letting a car go to pot without any maintenance? The timing belt should have been prevented, and I'm sure SOMEONE out there in the Land of Oz could've replaced that exhaust gasket if you'd been willing to pony up the dough.

It kills me that people regard cars, especially ones which are less than 10 years old, as "disposable" and they just bounce from one to another.

2003 Saturn VUE 4 cylinder

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 4 cylinder Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.6 / 10
Distance when acquired56500 miles
Most recent distance73500 miles
Previous carToyota Corolla

Summary:

Been a good SUV. Happy with it

Faults:

Rear wheel bearing replaced at 71k.

General Comments:

Car has been problem free since owned. First and only issue was wheel bearing.

Pros: Cargo room. Ride. No major problems.

Cons: Way too much cheap plastic. 4 cyl. is under powered.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th April, 2011

2003 Saturn VUE

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission Automatic
Distance when acquired16000 miles
Most recent distance188000 miles
Previous carFord Bronco

Summary:

My Vue has exceeded my expectations, great car

Faults:

I have had to replace wheel bearings, brakes, rotors and struts at the usual expected intervals.

Exhaust gasket at around 140k.

It would have been nice to have a little more clearance between the tire and spring perch on the front strut for snow chains.

General Comments:

Maybe I am lucky, but my Vue has put up with all of my fishing and camping excursions. The all wheel drive has gotten me through mud up to the door handles.

It's 2010, and I am getting close to 200k miles, and every time it goes through the car wash, I am astounded that the exterior looks like new (after a good wax job).

Mobile one always for the oil changes, and the engine runs great with an average per tank mileage of 21mpg.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th June, 2010

2003 Saturn VUE

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 2 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.3 / 10
Distance when acquired43000 miles
Most recent distance100000 miles

Summary:

Not worth it

Faults:

First the horn, then the transmission.

General Comments:

I paid $8800 for this car, but over $7000 in repairs.

The only reason I got a Saturn was because I thought it was a good car. I still owe money on it but I can't drive it. The Saturn mechanic finally said it's not worth fixing and sent me on my way with a piece of junk. I will never buy a Saturn again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 20th May, 2010

2003 Saturn VUE 2.2

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 2.2 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance120000 miles
Previous carSaturn SL

Summary:

I did good or lucky

Faults:

At 115,000 miles the right rear wheel bearing went out = $300.

Front brake pads replaced at 110,000 miles (normal to me). I did them myself (Simple job) = $63 for top of the line Wagner pads.

3 years ago it started rattling in the front suspension = $300 for long sway bars that connect center link to strut. 116,000 miles, the clunking got too loud. Perfect now at 119,000 miles.

Now at 119,000 miles my passenger strut is leaking (Normal because since 95,000 miles = I drive pizzas every night = 125 stop and go miles) 5 speed manual and HAPPY:)

General Comments:

Handles great.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th March, 2010

14th Apr 2010, 12:36

I am from Russia, and also used a Saturn 5 manual speed; nice car. It's covered about 72000 miles.

2003 Saturn VUE

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.6 / 10
Previous carSaturn VUE

Summary:

If there are a lot of complaints about the transmissions on the car, then fix the transmissions

Faults:

We have a 2003 Saturn Vue, and there have been complaints made.

When it was first purchased, we were told it was just how the car sounded.

Then the snow came. We got stuck in the snow and followed the instructions in the manual to get it out; that was in February.

While on a trip to another city, the car just stopped moving. It comes on, it just won't go forwards or backwards. That was on the 5th of March.

Now it is the 10th of March 2010 and the dealership says they don't know what is wrong with the car. They say they will have to get a specialist to look at it, because they don't have a clue what's wrong.

General Comments:

I think that car should have been looked at closer in the first place. For the complaints being made since the car was purchased there should have been some flags raised or at least an eyebrow. There is no reason as to why this problem should be persisting if it was reported to the dealership in the first place.

If customers do the right thing in reporting what is wrong with the car, then the car dealers should do the right thing, and honestly find and fix the problems they seem to be having with the transmissions.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 10th March, 2010

Average review marks: 5.6 / 10, based on 92 reviews