1998 Subaru Legacy 2.5L

Faults:

1998 Subaru Outback Legacy.

It has a blown head gasket at 130K miles. This is after spending about $3000 on a timing belt, water pump, new right front axle (boot cracked), spark plug wires, and paying to stop an oil leak (unsuccessful). Mechanic says at least $2600 to repair engine, but probably more.

General Comments:

Don't buy a Subaru with the 2.5L engine!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 14th November, 2007

1998 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT 2.5L

Summary:

One of my favourites!!!

Faults:

Nothing had gone wrong with the car right up to the day we sent it back.

General Comments:

It is an excellent vehicle.

Pros:

Reliability, styling, handling, interior comfort for front seat passengers, good size trunk, nice interior materials, AWD standard.

Cons:

Uses a bit of gas, rear seat not as comfortable as front seat, suspension kind of stiff on GT models.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th July, 2007

1998 Subaru Legacy Outback 2.5 liter

Summary:

Great Performance, apparent design flaws

Faults:

My head gasket blew at 144K miles.

General Comments:

From what I have read on this and other forums, Subaru has a problem with their 2.5 liter engine found in 98 Legacy Outbacks, among other vehicles around the same year. Two mechanics here in Seattle that work on Subarus have seen so many of these head gaskets blow that they have recommended a class action lawsuit. I am not a lawyer, but I am interested in pursuing this. If you are interested in being part of such a suit, and have a similar problem, please let me know via email:

Gsmith1024@hotmail.com.

Thanks.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 14th December, 2006

1998 Subaru Legacy GT Limited Sedan 4 cylinder 2.5 liter

Summary:

The price of a used Subaru is worth the money, no matter the style

Faults:

Radiator failure at 230,000 mile mark.

1st tune up at 215,000 mile mark.

Wheel kit left front had to be replaced due to wear and tear of mountain and washed out roads.

General Comments:

Great car for all types of weather driving.

Very happy with the longevity of the mechanical parts.

Does not perform well on 87 or 89 octane gas.

Not favorable to use less than high performance tires.

Very good traction control and steering.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 31st October, 2006

31st Oct 2006, 15:23

So you have to use premium? eew that's a little pricy!!

30th Mar 2007, 15:32

I always put the lower grade regular gas in my '98 Subaru Legacy GT wagon 2.5 engine and it runs perfectly. I bought it used at 44k and have put 50K more on it. It has only needed brakes and tires, nothing else! It is the most reliable car I have ever owned. However, the all wheel drive issue, when one tire unfortunately gets damaged and you need to replace all four tires, was depressing for me to find out about. However, this was not the fault of the vehicle itself, but is more of an all wheel drive issue that I learned about.

1998 Subaru Legacy GT 2.5

Summary:

Great car, wonderful ride

Faults:

Well the motor went (very surprised) no one ever heard of this happening to a Subaru. I spun a rod bearing at 149,000 miles.

General Comments:

I love this car I will never buy another brand again if I can help it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 12th July, 2006

1998 Subaru Legacy GT 2.5L

Summary:

Lots to love, but one big thing to hate

Faults:

My engine seized up at only 80,000 miles and now needs to be replaced and/or rebuilt.

General Comments:

I love everything about this car, but I don't know if I will ever buy another one as my Legacy should have run close to 200,000 miles without ever having the engine seize up. It was very disheartening as this was my very first car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 12th June, 2006

13th Jun 2006, 14:05

What were the circumstances around its "seizing up"? Cause engines just don't quit like that.

21st Jan 2008, 19:21

Usually cars seize up due to poor maintenance. In many cases, Subaru's leak oil, and this problem means always having to replace oil. Not doing so could result in a premature death for the engine.

1998 Subaru Legacy GT Wagon 2.5L

Summary:

A lot of money for a lot less car

Faults:

Power Antennae (twice) 45K and 60K km.

Power Mirror 50K km.

Head Gasket 90K km.

Window Pads 75K km.

Clutch Pack Housing 93K km.

General Comments:

I've read all the other reviews here and I wonder if I am driving the same car.

To be honest, I decided to buy this car for my wife (Automatic, used in 2001 with 30K km on it) purely on paper after listing all of the attributes we were looking for in a vehicle; Safe (crash worthiness), Secure (AWD, we live in the Canadian Shield Snow Belt), Spacious (wagon), Reliable (Consumers Reports consistent Recommended Buy) and Operating Costs (insurance, maintenance, gas mileage etc.) and Resale value.

I was taken aback the first time I test drove it. It sounded pretty "agricultural" to me and pretty noisy at speed. I was however duly impressed with its compliant ride and truly exceptional handling. It met the spec, the price was competitive; we took the plunge.

As other here have suggested, the Automatic does indeed shift roughly, with a hell of a shudder between 2nd and 3rd gear, especially if driven gently, and has a flat torque spot at that range as well that require a complete red-line pushing kickdown to get out of. Throttle tip-in has always been abrupt at best which has made for less than elegant/smooth standing starts. It's actually smoother if you drive it aggressively. The interior/ergonomics were/are rather underwhelming in relation to other Japanese cars I've driven/owned of that vintage, with no backlighting and poor positioning of a lot of controls, and cheap feeling materials. The seats are low, wide and flat and not very supportive. We always took our other car if we went anywhere of any distance.

With a small gas tank and poor mileage, no doubt due in part to the AWD system and rear axle, it was just as well as it has meant frequent fill ups. The jerky jack-rabbit starts probably don't help, but I suspect that it was programmed to respond like this to appease North Americans' (and the French as well) penchant for 0 - 60MPH performance. Gearing seems to be low though, with the engine turning over at a buzzy 3150RPM at 72MPH, the police-tolerated, if not legal speed limit on most major Canadian highways in the region.

It has been by far the most expensive car we've ever owned to maintain, and that's despite near religious maintenance and easy duty with 90% highway mileage. A testament to how easy the mileage it has endured is that we've only once had to do any brake service (front) over the 90K km we've owned it so far, unlike some of the other posters here. The back disks will soon be due however. One of the issues that we've faced is that nobody else seems to want to, or can, service it, so we're beholden to our Subaru dealer with no competition for service and/or parts.

Although the drivetrain has been reasonably sound, (more on that later), it has had numerous failures; Power Antennae (twice), Power mirror, scratches in the windows from dirt infiltrating the pads that hold the frameless windows and more, all of which have cost $450 - $475 Canadian to repair. As a matter of fact, almost all of the repairs we've had done have been the same minimum $450 - $475, with the rest costing way more.

At 90K km, we started to experience a grinding sensation when turning corners. When we brought it in for its 93K km oil change, we were told that it's a "normal" sensation for an AWD vehicle. When we brought it in for its 98K km service, and complained again that it seemed to be getting worse, again we were told that it's just normal wear and tear. That service cost CDN$1000 as it apparently needed new head gaskets as well. At 103K km, we brought it in for it's regular oil change, and it suddenly was road tested and was diagnosed as needing a new Clutch Pack housing and Planer gear within 20min of arriving. Naturally, the warranty expired at 5yrs or 100K km and as it turned out, we had started complaining about the grinding 31 days after the 5yr warranty expired, thus were denied the warranty claim to the tune of another $1100. Apparently all of that complaining beforehand about the grinding sensation fell on deaf ears.

We have now been trying to sell this car for a month and all comers have taken a pass, as the "agricultural" sound has gotten progressively worse. We have given up and are trading both of our current cars in to get rid of it, and this despite having sunk a considerable amount in cosmetic and preservation dollars, like annual rust proofing, window tinting, twice yearly detailing, upgraded and winter tires etc, etc.

Despite all that, we still hadn't quite given up on Subaru, as we seriously considered a new 2005 GT that finally has the power to go with the Boy Racer looks. But after one look at the price and the past repair bills, and we just said forget it. We have just ordered a Passat Wagon instead.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 7th July, 2004

12th Dec 2005, 22:42

Sounds like you got screwed over by the dealer as always happens unless you know cars.

My Impreza with a 4sp auto is able to go 75mph at 2700rpms. It's 1998, but maybe it's a weight difference that allows me to go at lower rpms.

I'm sorry you left Subaru, but you picked one heck of a car maker to go to. VW's latest cars from 1998 to current (they're getting a bit better) have been plagued by all kinds of defects and you should read some of the reviews. Have fun...