1987 Volvo 240 DL

Summary:

For the money you can't beat Volvo quality

General Comments:

I just turned 16 about a month ago and I was not expecting to get a car until I turned 17. However my Dad spotted an 87 240 for sale, and decided it would make a great first car. My family has owned Volvo's forever so it is only befitting that my first car be a Volvo.

The car handles great for its age. Fit and finish is superb. The car is in great shape with no dings or scratches on the body.

The blue (kind of odd interior color) cloth seats need to be cleaned.

It won't be the newest or the nicest car in the student parking lot next year, but for the money it's a great car (only $1,600)

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 31st May, 2005

1987 Volvo 240 DL

Summary:

It's not the

Faults:

So far, have only replaced the battery.

I accidentally kicked the drivers door map pocket, causing it to crack due to it's age.

General Comments:

Where to begin?

I was 19 when my father helped me purchase my first Volvo.

It was a 1976 244.

We bought the car for $650 dollars, and it already had 150k miles.

At the time I thought that it was a worthless piece of rusted pre-civil war art. The only reason I'm not driving it now (17 yrs later) is because of the body rust and a failing steering knuckle. I was amazed that this 4 speed stick could handle and jump off the line better than my friends American cars.

When the car was no longer safe to drive (steering knuckle) it had 228,000 miles and still purred like a kitten. I have talked with about this car with fondness ever since we sold it for parts.

Now for the good part!

When I initially met my wife, her family had a black 1987 Volvo 240 DL sitting in the drive way. Due to her mother's illness, the car hadn't been driven for 3 yrs at that point. She has since passed away, and my Father-in-Law couldn't bring himself to sell the car for sentimental reasons.

This year, he also passed away, and left the car to my wife and I.

She isn't interested in the car, but I definitely am.

Okay, for all of you that are familiar with Volvos, tell me what you would do.

The car has been sitting for approximately 10 yrs.

It has been outside with cloth car cover protecting it.

The body has no visible rust. The paint is only slightly oxidized, but I am going to have it detailed.

It will need brakes (because of the way my in-laws drove with the left foot on the brake).

And the tires all have evidence of sun damage.

I had to jump the car with my truck to move it, and immediately it started up like someone had driven it the day before. I drove it around the block, and the steering is a little stiff, but besides the brakes, you wouldn't have known that the car had not been run in 10 yrs.

I plan to change all of the fluids, filters, hoses, and belts. With a new set of brakes and tires, this car should last at least another 10 years.

But WAIT!

Here's the best part...

The car only has 65,000 original miles!!!

My father-in-law also left a loaded 2001 Monte Carlo with 55k miles, and we are already planning to sell it.

I would MUCH rather have an old Volvo, than a newer Monte!

I can't wait to get it running on the road!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th November, 2004

8th Nov 2004, 10:58

I'm sorry that the comment line didn't show up as I had typed it.

The comment line reads:

"It's not the"...

(and sad to say, the next review reads)

"Best car in the world"

Personally, I think that it is one of the best cars in the world!!

Needless to say, that is not the impression I want to give.

What my comment line should read is:

"It may not be the IN car to drive, but, I'll still be driving this car when the IN cars are dead and gone!"