Nissan Pulsar Review from Sri Lanka

1998 Nissan Pulsar V-ZR 1.6L Neo VVL

Year of manufacture1998
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 1.6L Neo VVL Manual
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.4 / 10
Distance when acquired50000 kilometres
Most recent distance57000 kilometres
Previous carHonda Integra


Great car when everything is working


My VVL controller is faulty, as a result I am really very unhappy with the performance of the car. Things will hopefully improve as soon as the part arrives.

Engine mounts are not good, there is a lot of vibration when the car is started.

General Comments:

Great handling and looking car.

Sadly very little information about available mods and tuning info.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th February, 2001

Average review marks: 6.4 / 10, based on 1 review