Citroen Visa Reviews from UK and Ireland

1986 Citroen Visa GTi 1.6 petrol

Year of manufacture1986
First year of ownership1988
Most recent year of ownership1991
Engine and transmission 1.6 petrol Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired23000 miles
Most recent distance56000 miles
Previous carVauxhall Astra

Summary:

Cheap and good performance

Faults:

Radiator fan switch connector corroded.

Petrol filler cap leaked when going around corners.

Exhaust pipe rotted - difficult to find a replacement.

Side Indicator connectors corroded - soldered the wires to the bulbs eventually.

General Comments:

Probably the best I ever owned for blasting country lanes.

Very flimsy construction and the front windows used to pull away from the car at about 70mph - very noisy.

Pretty poor fuel economy which wasn't helped by a leaking fuel filler.

Very small inside and the boot was lost to the spare wheel.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 20th September, 2002

1986 Citroen Visa GTi 1.6 (115BHP version)

Year of manufacture1986
First year of ownership1993
Most recent year of ownership1994
Engine and transmission 1.6 (115BHP version) Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.8 / 10
Distance when acquired60000 miles
Most recent distance70000 miles
Previous carBMW 5 Series

Summary:

Fast, fragile, and fundamentally flawed

Faults:

Gear linkage popped out of place with monotonous regularity.

Thermostat for fan failed, causing the car to overheat.

All sorts of electrical problems.

Air flow meter needed re-setting.

Stalling at low speeds.

General Comments:

The GTi is basically a body-kitted Visa with the same engine as the Peugeot 205 GTi crammed into it. It therefore suffered from the Visa's diabolical build quality (I think they made them from old Gitanes packets) and the 205's questionable reliability. Having previously owned a BMW 518i, it was a bit of a culture shock.

On the odd occasion it ran, the performance was excellent, with a very free-revving engine. The car was lighter than the 205, so was fractionally quicker off the mark. Winding up XR3i drivers has never been more fun.

Handling was good too, with a wide front track, and reasonably chunky 185 tyres.

The interior was crap. Unsupportive seats, cheap plastics, and instruments that had minds and moods of their own. The Visa is also a very narrow car, so it helps to be on good terms with your passenger. Long journeys weren't much fun.

The boot space was pathetic. With the 1.6 engine, the spare tyre had to be relocated from its usual home above the engine (apparently it directed the air flow on early air-cooled Visas) to the boot, which it filled.

It was fun while it lasted, and I got more trading it in than I paid for it. You wouldn't catch me buying another one though.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st November, 2001

16th Nov 2005, 02:49

I think you are expecting a bit much of the build quality as a Visa cost a third of the BMW when sold new.

20th Oct 2006, 10:07

Whether or not you realise it when you buy it, this is still a poorly designed, shoddily built car. Ignoring a car's (many) faults won't help potential buyers.

Average review marks: 6.0 / 10, based on 2 reviews