1986 Ford Escort xr3i 1.6

Summary:

A bloke pulling car

Faults:

The module was changed after renewing a starter motor, leads, plugs, rotor arm, distributor cap and coil as you would to find the fault, I found the module which is the one connected to the distributer the problem. I found when driving the car suddenly it would die on me like as if you had just ran out of petrol. Other than that I find this car very reliable.

General Comments:

Very quick, very economical, still gets the looks considering the age of the old girl. However this car has been lowered you can feel the bumps very well almost like as if you are in a go-cart.Doesn't like ramps, neither does the exhaust.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th June, 2002

26th Jun 2002, 17:27

I must agree fine automobile

1986 Ford Escort Cabriolet 1.6 EFI

Summary:

Great value for money

Faults:

I have just had to replace the engine as the old engine was burning oil due to worn pistons.

Recaro seats have started to wear on the edges.

General Comments:

The engine is now an EFI (electronic fuel injection). The car originally had an MFI (manual fuel injection). The new engine is much quicker and also more economical.

I would recommend an Escort to anyone, very rarely do things go wrong and if they do it is cheap to put right.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 17th June, 2002

1986 Ford Escort RS Turbo 1.9

Summary:

Wouldn't own another one, engine not up to heavy tuning

Faults:

Starter failed @ 65000.

Crank thumpy @ 70000.

General Comments:

Not a bad first time tunable car. Produced around 300BHP once I'd completed the project http://marksrsturbo.tripod.com, which wasn't too bad from a bog 135BHP engine. Did cost around £15000 for modifications however.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 17th June, 2002

1986 Ford Escort L 1.3

Summary:

Poorly built, rusty and slow workhorse

Faults:

By the time I got this car, most of the major components had been replaced because of the mileage.

The only problem I had with it was the dreaded rust, you could almost see it spreading before your eyes!

I only did one minor service to the car - oil and filter, air filter and spark plugs. That was all it needed to keep it running, very cheap to service.

General Comments:

Although fairly reliable, it was a complete rust bucket. I know that it's old and eighties cars generally weren't as well built as todays, but this was especially bad. If rust sets in the cars had it.

I have since learned through experience that the equivalent Vauxhalls of the time (1.3 & 1.4 Astra and Cavalier) are better built, rust less and go, stop and handle better.

I could not get on with the dashboard and control layout, it's not very ergonomic.

The only good thing about this car is the low cost of servicing it. It can be driven into the ground without too much going wrong.

It is a completely unremarkable car, buy one for peanuts, use it then chuck it away.

Whatever you do don't pay over the odds for one of these, even rare ones in good condition are not worth a lot.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 27th February, 2002

1986 Ford Escort GL 1.4

Summary:

Boring and rusty

Faults:

Persistently, the engine was damp. It didn't like the cold.

Rear lights suffered from condensation, thus effected the electrics.

Starter motor packed up.

1st gear is difficult to select.

The car failed its MOT on severe rust - shocking for a 1986 metallic Ford.

General Comments:

For one of the most respected car manufacturers in the world, Ford should be ashamed about this particular model.

Plenty of room for family/friends and quite comfortable.

A nondescript car - ideal for common criminals.

Keep a flask of coffee in the car, it is boring to drive.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 28th July, 2001

31st Jul 2001, 13:14

Failed it's MOT on rust at 14 years old?, think yourself lucky, most Escort's from this era were lucky to last 10 years before the bodywork fell to bits - metallic or not!

22nd Jan 2002, 13:36

1988 1.4 GL - 108,000 miles - Still a good little runner. Experienced the 'damp rear light' problem. Replaced the bulb holder and plugs, sealed the perished rear light gaskets with bathroom sealant. No more damp problem! I don't expect it to perform like a Ferrari, but it still gets me from A to B quite comfortably. All in all, a good little car for its age.