1992 Ford Fiesta Popular - 1.1 1.1

Summary:

A painfully slow, cheap frustrating car

Faults:

Nothing too bad.

Steering failed (loose bolt), start-up motor failed.

General Comments:

Although I didn't expect speed for a 1.1 engine, this car is just ridiculously slow. Overtaking becomes a very daring stunt, a couple of times I've attempted to over take a vehicle only to realise the car just won't go fast enough... never even think about going in the right hand lane on a dual carriage way.

It's highly frustrating to drive if ever you want to get somewhere fast, I recall crawling up a small hill at 45mph with my foot to the ground... screaming at it to go faster and hitting the steering wheel (that's probably why it broke)

On a flat road with no hills, the top speed is about 75... I can get 80 out of it if I start swearing at it.

I really hated this car, from the manual choke, manual need for correcting indicator, no central locking, no Intermitant speed of windscreen wiper... it is just a very cheap car.

Very basic interior, there's not even a glove box.

The worst thing is, for all this slow slow speed...it's not THAT good on petrol. My recent 1.6 Toyota MR2 is about the same on fuel if driven at the same speed!

The best thing about the car is the full beam light is good...

If you're looking for a cheap 1.1 car that's low on fuel, you can do so much better than this! A rover 100 for instance outperforms this on every level.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 14th October, 2003

24th Mar 2004, 05:38

You had a duff one. A 1.1 Fiesta will do a ton. Did you ever service it?

6th Jun 2004, 18:03

Why did you buy the car if you were so unhappy with it?it's a cheap car, its not pretending to be a jaguar is it!

30th Jun 2004, 02:01

^ Insurance dictated no Jaguars.

I've found out that despite the 1.1 badge at the back, the engine is in fact 1.0!

12th Jan 2005, 09:10

Why did you buy it if you weren't happy with it? I think to be fair, he wouldn't have known how bad it was, and to now it was bad, he would have had to own it, which he did, and knows how bad it is!

The case of the engine is interesting: Weather you have the 1.0 or 1.1, they're both rubbish. I used to have an E reg Nissan Micra with 130k on the clock, and that would totally obliterate even 1.3 or 1.4 fiesta's. The 1.1 or 1.0 didn't stand a chance.

30th Mar 2010, 03:10

Oh crap, I need a car and quickly... it's the only thing I've found for sale on my budget...

Bye bye my 2.0i petrol.

Sob!

1992 Ford Fiesta Olympus 1.1 petrol

Summary:

A cheap, reliable runaround

Faults:

So far I've only had to replace the choke cable and get a new tyre.

General Comments:

For a first car it's great.

Performance is pretty poor, but it's to be expected of an 11 year old car.

Handling can only really be described as numb.

Good economy although the engine sounds really harsh. This seems to be the case in most mk3 Fiestas.

I'm now looking to replace her soon, but I can't decide whether to get a Punto Sporting or Saxo Westcoast. All opinions on these cars would be greatly appreciated.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th September, 2003

1992 Ford Fiesta LX 1.1 petrol

Summary:

A generally very good little car let down by poor performance

Faults:

The temperature gauge failed.

The rear wiper motor failed.

The clutch ratchet failed.

Part of the dashboard illumination failed.

The front suspension legs had to be replaced.

There was a short circuit in the alternator which caused the battery to drain prematurely.

The car started smoking and using oil rapidly after about 70,000 miles. I am told that this is a common fault on HCS (high compression) versions of Ford's CVH engines. The tappets were also a bit loud, although this is again a common fault on Ford CVH engines. Neither of these problems will stop the engine running however, and can be kept under control with regular servicing.

General Comments:

Well, I must say that this was one very decent car on the whole.

The fault list looks worse than it actually was, as most of the faults mentioned didn't actually prevent the car from being driven.

The only other things I had to replace were service items such as brake pads and spark plugs etc. It also needed a new clutch at approx 60,000 miles, but this is to be expected at the end of the day.

There was a significant amount of rust along the sills, wheel arches and front/rear valances, although this is pretty much to be expected on a 10 year old vehicle. I wouldn't say that the car was worse than any other vehicle of a similar age. The remainder of the car was generally rust free, other than under the fuel cap (this is a common fault on mark 3 Fiestas without the little door that covers the fuel cap).

The car served me very well through three years of university, plus a few months either side.

Running costs were very good, with 45mpg easily achievable, although the insurance grouping was a tad high for a 1.1 at group 5.

I really must take my hat off to the Ford dealers I came into contact with. Not only were they reasonably cheap, but I rarely had to wait more than a couple of hours for servicing/repairs, and parts were almost always available on the spot.

Good though it was, the car was far from perfect though.

Performance was nothing short of pathetic (18.2 seconds 0-60mph) ; this was made worse by the fact that the car had a manual choke. On cold mornings it sometimes felt as if there wasn't even enough power to move off on level ground!

The ride and handling left a fair bit to be desired as well. Mark 3 Fiestas were designed at a time when Ford didn't seem think that any degree of driving enjoyment was necessary. A world away from the mid 1990's onward Fords without a doubt!

I must admit however that I was genuinely sorry to see the car go, and if its replacement (a mark 1 Clio) can be as good then I'll be very happy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th March, 2003

24th Mar 2004, 06:05

The HCS and CVH are two totally separate engines. The HCS was an evolution of the old pushrod "Kent" crossflow engine, and the engine that was fitted to your car. It's a prehistoric unit, having first appeared in 1959 in the Anglia. The tappet noise is a common problem, but as this engine has traditional adjustable tappets, is not usually anything to worry about.

The CVH was an overhead cam unit which appeared in the early 80's in the front drive Escort, although did appear in the Fiesta in 1.4 and 1.6 (including XR2/early XR2i) and in turbo form in the RS models. These have hydraulic tappets which, provided regular oil changes are carried out, are usually problem free.