2005 Ford Ka Style 1.3 petrol

Summary:

Trusty but rusty!

Faults:

Beyond the usual wear and tear not much - the car was generally reliable and no major problems except one very common issue - rust. The car looked terrible when I was finished with it. I cleaned it and looked after it, and at 5 years old it looked fine when I bought it, but at only 10 years it looked like a 25 year old car!

General Comments:

This Ford Ka was my first car. I enjoyed most of my time with it, but was sick of how bad it looked in its final years.

1.3 Style model was pretty basic - slow and not much equipment. Cheap to run however, good insurance at the time I needed it (being younger), and it did 40 - 45 mpg.

Fun to drive, handled quite sharp, but the power was just not there.

Interior was cramped and noisy.

As a basic cheap first car you cannot expect too much. It did me well for 5 years and was reliable so I suppose that was enough, just a shame about the rust that made me scrap it in 2015 - it was everywhere, around the fuel cap, arches, door sills, underside, and so on.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 18th December, 2022

22nd Nov 2023, 22:39

Yup, had one of these as well, terrible cars, mine rusted to nothing as well, started at the fuel cap.

2005 Ford Ka 1 1.3 petrol

Summary:

Cheap, but you're aware it's cheap

Faults:

23k - Heater would only push out hot air (part replaced).

23k - Driver side wiper blade came loose, colliding with the passenger side one on the motorway (Bolt tightened - still needs done every month or so).

24k - Rear passenger side spring snapped (part replaced).

26k - Heater would only push out hot air again (part replaced - again).

37k - Gearbox making rattling noises and crunching slightly changing gears. Local garage recommends running it until it dies.

In addition, there is some rust around the base of the rear wiper and the top of the petrol filler neck.

General Comments:

The good points :-

Cheap. We paid 3k from an independent garage for this 23,000 example when it was 4 years old (with a full service history). Couldn't find anything nearly as new for the price.

Economy. We usually keep tabs on the MPG from tank to tank, and it's never dipped below 40mpg. Usually hovers around the 46/47 mark.

Easy to drive. Bought for my wife, she finds it nice and easy to drive with good visibility, a light clutch, and decent enough brakes.

Seat comfort. Perhaps subjective, but we drove to London and back in it (500ish miles each way - we're in Scotland) and didn't experience any seat discomfort.

The bad points :-

Reliability. Although the majority of issues we've had have been niggly or common, we are disappointed with what looks like some sort of gearbox failure. Especially considering the car is only used for a 30 mile commute to work along a dual carriageway, and barely sees any town driving. My 21 year old MX-5 hasn't broken in any way in the 3 years I've owned it; I wouldn't have expected so many problems with a car just under 5 years old.

Rust. I wouldn't expect any rust on a 5 year old car. Probably should have done my homework before hand though, looks like a common problem.

Road noise. At 60mph+ road noise does become fairly apparent. Not so bad in the front seats, but not really possible to hold a conversation with people in the back. I am however, aware this is intended as a town car, so might not be an issue for some people.

Summary :-

Probably alright for low mileage, around town work, but I wouldn't subject it to anything more than that. Feels like with age, it will become a real problem. We're already tempted to sell on and go for something a little older, but with a better reputation.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 21st January, 2011