1996 Ford Scorpio Reviews from UK and Ireland

1996 Ford Scorpio Ultima 2.3 petrol

Model year1996
Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.3 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired123000 miles
Most recent distance126000 miles
Previous carFord Granada

Summary:

Fantastic value, very underrated

Faults:

Rear wheel bearing failed shortly after purchase - £30 DIY fix.

Changed all 4 discs and pads shortly after purchase - £80 DIY fix.

General Comments:

Very well equipped, climate control, full leather, electric seats, traction control, 6-CD changer etc...

Superbly comfortable and spacious.

Good performance for the size of vehicle, handles very nicely and reasonable fuel economy at 24.5 mpg - better than the 18mpg I used to get from my precious car - 2.9i Granada Scorpio Estate.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th September, 2007

1996 Ford Scorpio Ultima Estate 2.9 12v

Model year1996
Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 2.9 12v Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired90000 miles
Most recent distance93000 miles
Previous carFiat Tempra

Summary:

An under-rated, very luxurious car

Faults:

The air con compressor clutch was faulty when I purchased this car. Easiest repair is to replace the compressor at a cost of about £95 and re-gassing at around £30, so no big deal.

Apart from that a fully working car.

General Comments:

As far as image goes, some self-appointed car critics don't seem to like it. It's Granada heritage doesn't help this either, particularly when it's referred to as a 'Granny', which is most annoying. But aside from those few, most of my peers are impressed by the sheer size and extravagance of the thing. I bought the car partly to fit the image requirements of my job, and this it achieves well.

This car is extremely well equipped, and has just about everything, ABS, Self-levelling suspension, PAS, airbag, seat belt pretensioners, air con, cruise control, auto gearbox, fuel computer, alarm/immobiliser, electric boot catch, remote stereo controls, CD changer, dual zone climate control, electric memory drivers seat, heated front and rear screens, electric windows with global closing, etc.

Unlike it's predecessor the Granada Scorpio (which I owned a few years ago) I was surprised to find that it has no electric passenger seat or electric rear seats! In addition the seats aren't heated. Some cost cutting here I think.

Ride quality is extremely good, engine and gearbox silent and smooth, and very little road noise. Apparently Ford spent a fortune on R&D to make this car uber-smooth. In comparison to the older model, this car handles better, although is not quite as smooth over bumps and potholes, but I'm being super critical here, it is still excellent, and just as smooth as a 7 series beemer.

Interior space is vast, huge boot big enough to sleep in (this is the estate). Plenty of rear space and legroom, enough to read a newspaper in comfort. Much more spacious in the rear seats than my Volvo estate. And the seats are cushy too.

Performance is OK, 145bhp is not spectacular these days, but it is still a fairly quick car and out-powers the average family tin box or reps car. The auto box is very smooth and pleasing too. (If you want mega-power buy the 2.9 24v Cosworth, which does of course drink even more fuel). More importantly for this type of car it will cruise at speed on the motorway in near silence. Although it handles well in the corners and gets around country roads surprisingly well it is still a big lumbering cruiser and was never meant to burn off hot hatches around town.

Overall this is a lot of car for not much money and despite bad press a tidy example still looks an expensive car. My advice would be to buy a tidy one, fix any little defects, valet it, polish it, service it, and you'll end up with a very nice motor indeed.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd October, 2006

1st Nov 2006, 11:51

I agree that the 24v cosworth is even quicker, and therefore in principle the better car. But I was looking for a clean, tidy car and I just didn't find a nice cosworth. They were all 'ex rally-boy' cars complete with torn seats, bald tyres, and smashed bumpers. Compare that with a shiny low mileage 12v which had been looked after (new discs, brakes and shocks, waxoiled, serviced with full history, valeted, and apart from the recently failed air-con pump, every gadget working). I bought the best Scorpio I could find, and it was a 12 valve.

16th Jan 2008, 12:52

You've also got to bear in mind that the 4 cylinder and 24v Cossie engines, bother have specific weaknesses, which the 12v doesn't, being the tried and tested Granda engine.

In short it does depend on whats available.

Average review marks: 7.3 / 10, based on 5 reviews