1996 Jaguar XJ6 X300 3.2 petrol


Fantastic if you can afford to run it


Front wheel bearing after 3 years.

Radiator bracket rusted.

Sunroof cable.

Fuel pump.

General Comments:

I have owned this car for 3 years, and I must say it has been the most pleasurable car I have ever owned. I get looks of envy as I drive past.

The paint work gleams; it has no rust or dents apart from the odd bit of lacquer lifting; looks as good as new in the right light.

It's not the most economical car I've owned. It does 20 MPG on a good day, but it's worth the money for the fuel to drive in style.

You would have to wait to the day I die to part me from this beautiful creation by Jaguar. Probably the best car in the WORLD... Thank you Jaguar.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 27th April, 2013

1996 Jaguar XJ6 Executive 3.2 24v straight 6


If you can afford to rebuild, a good car, not brilliant, good. Rivals offer more though...


Cam position sensor, caused long cranking and battery discharge.

Rear subframe bushes, wandering handling.

Front upper wishbone bushes, wonky handling, clunking.

Shock absorber bushes... clunking and knocking.

Radio display bulbs no longer working.

Timing chain noisy, tensioner replaced...

Fuel gauge temperamental.

Gearstick doesn't always select park fully.

General Comments:

As usual, an overrated Jag. Thankfully not mine, my Dads, but that means I have to mend it.. I'm a mechanic! Lots of work for me.

They tend to rot here in the UK, and the lacquer coat will peel as well; we found one in good condition thankfully.

The 3.2 engine is OK, not bad on fuel averaging 29 MPG. The autobox is OK once the cables are adjusted, otherwise a little harsh, but that's techs not knowing what's up...

Takes 9 litres of engine oil, so be warned when servicing, ££s!

Timing chain tensioner has been replaced, but is still a little noisy. It can stay like that, a £500 strip down isn't worth it when the cars are worth so little.

Seats are small, and the boot and rear seat are cramped, A/C is good though.

The ride comfort is not all that to be honest, Jag drivers clearly don't ever drive anything else because rivals ride far better. A 1989 Camry rides better than this heavy old bus, the suspension is fairly harsh, and because the trim isn't that well made, it's not the smoothest. Old fashioned windscreen seals mean there is a fair bit of noise.

The steering is lovely though, perfect weight and as smooth as silk, but that's all I like mechanically.

It's hugely over complicated for no gain in driving or reliability. It has random little problems all the time, which are frustrating. Your average Jag over will forgive it as foibles... I won't, I demand more (old Audi owner).

Parts are relatively expensive and it's a bit of a pig to work on when dealing with the oily bits. Labour rates are therefore expensive if you can't do it yourself.

Fuel gauge and range can suddenly drop to 0, and new parts at huge cost are the only fix. Disappointing at this mileage.

Suspension wears out unduly quickly due to huge weight and tiny bushes/underspecced parts.

I find it hard to trust its reliability. Things working fine can suddenly stop; trans Europe trips are not done in this car...

It has an unusual ambiance to drive, it's a great place to be and to sit, so I can see why people forgive the ridiculous. But honestly, it's not really that good a car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 28th November, 2012

3rd Jan 2015, 18:32

Excellent review, spot on, no doubt. I was considering buying one. Outstanding condition, low mileage 1996 for $2000 Canadian. I guess I was taken by the looks, and assumed that the ride would be as great as a Jag that I rode in, in the early 80s.

Being somewhat anal retentive, I could never put up with what appears to be constant irritating problems.