1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Reviews from UK and Ireland

1997 Mitsubishi Lancer evo 4 2.0 turbo

Model year1997
Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.0 / 10
Distance when acquired35000 miles
Most recent distance45000 miles
Previous carMazda RX7

Summary:

Wet dream

Faults:

I cracked a piston due to a blocked fuel filter, and a very heavy foot.

General Comments:

I have owned a lot of cheaper performance cars, the evo is by far the best all rounder.U get so much feed back from the car, and it's a magnet in the wet and the dry.Haven't had the pleasure of ice yet!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th December, 2004

24th Nov 2006, 16:10

Not a very informative review!

1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV GSR Turbocharged 2.0

Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Turbocharged 2.0 Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.4 / 10
Distance when acquired33000 miles
Most recent distance36000 miles
Previous carNissan Pulsar

Summary:

Crazy car. Good value for money if you find a good one

Faults:

Windscreen washer sprays stopped working.

It eats tyres when driven hard.

Under heavy braking, the pads fade and braking is poor.

Air-conditioning packed up.

General Comments:

OK, I used to own a modified Nissan Sunny/Pulsar GTi-R, that was about 280bhp, 60 appeared in under 5 seconds.

It was seriously quick. But the Evo feels so much more stable. The handling is precise and extremely responsive.

In standard form the car was a joy, and with just a new exhaust system and air filter, the car feels so much more responsive.

The Evolution V is currently £3,000 more to buy than the Evolution IV. That's why I opted for the Evolution IV.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th January, 2003

16th Nov 2009, 13:38

The Evo 4 is a very good car, not much separates the 4 from the 5 or 6.

On special versions they might be slightly more powerful, but not that different.

Average review marks: 6.2 / 10, based on 2 reviews