1996 Renault Megane Coupe 1.6e

Summary:

Not too bad

Faults:

Lost 1st and 2nd gear suddenly.

A friend attempted to jump my car, but put jump leads on wrong way round. Can't start the car and 'electronic incident warning light' stays on.

Seats have worn extremely badly.

Car gets wet inside in heavy rain storms.

Handbrake light stays on continuously.

General Comments:

The battery seemed to be flat for no reason - drove home one night, and had to pop back out minutes later, and the battery was flat by then.

Brilliant on fuel.

Cheap parts when needed.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 5th May, 2010

1996 Renault Megane 16v Coupe 2.0

Summary:

Very cheap, very smart and very quick

Faults:

Nothing too major, rusted exhaust which was due to age, rear pads and disks, & replacement temperature sender as the temp gauge stopped working.

General Comments:

The car looks great, it looks just nice and subtle, the 2.0 16v coupe does look pretty much the same as all the other phase 1 coupes, I personally like that, but some people prefer the quick model to stand out a bit from the rest of the range, but that's down to personal choice.

I have found it to be also very comfy in the front and very well specced. I have done long drives up and down the country, and I am always impressed with how comfy it is. The same can't be said for the back however, which is tiny, so if you plan to go somewhere with 4 adults, prepare for some moaning! The boot isn't too bad, but the opening to it is tiny; if you have got kids, you can only just about get a pushchair through it, or if you want a sub, getting a big 15" in is a bit of a nightmare!

However the best bit about the car is that it flies, as other people have said on here it doesn't look much different to the 1.6 (which is a nice car, but couldn't pull the skin of a rice pudding), so most people are surprised when you nail it. It also goes nice round bends, but it's a bit skittish in the wet. The brakes are good, but mine had bad brake fade, however I got some more expensive pads and now it's great. I quite often do journeys from the Midlands to Wales, and it's so much fun, it really puts a smile on your face!

It's also pretty cheap to run, especially now petrol has gone cheaper; on my usual run to work at normal motorway speeds and through a bit of traffic, I can get about 35-40 mpg, and insurance is pretty cheap too. Parts don't seem to be too expensive either, I do all the work myself and it's not too bad to work on, but under the bonnet it's a bit tight (but not as bad as a Bravo HGT!)

However Renaults as most people know have a reputation for poorer build quality than most rivals; from my experience with Renaults (and I have had a few) you get a few that literally fall apart, and ones which are fine that run and run for years, so you get a few which ruin the reputation of a good car. My advice would be that you don't buy the 1st one you see. If you're a bit skint and looking into the cheaper £500 to £600 mark, as long as you're legal to drive it, test drive a better one that's more expensive than you can afford so you have got something better to compare the cheaper one too, at least then you know if it's slow, doesn't handle or stop etc etc, and try and get something as standard as you can, as most of the cheap coupes have been ragged.

But as long as you're careful with which ones you buy, I really do think this car is fantastic. I have owned much more expensive and more modern cars, but this easily is the best car I have had.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th January, 2009