1997 Rover - Austin 400 420SDi 2.0-litre turbo diesel

Summary:

Cheap and surprisingly cheerful

Faults:

As usual with '90s Rover/Hondas, the driver's side window doesn't slide in its runners.

Top intercooler hose burst, a new hose was almost £40 from the Rover dealer - £40 is an awful lot for a piece of rubber.

General Comments:

This car is serious value for money, mine was £700 and for that you get a perfectly respectable saloon car with a good specification - mine has air-conditioning, steering wheel radio controls, electric windows all-round, electric mirrors, remote central locking etc. Someone I know recently bought a similarly aged, mileaged and specced Peugeot 406 TD for twice the price - the Pug is nicer to drive and better inside, but still nowhere near twice the car.

The L-series 1994cc turbo-diesel is an excellent engine - despite being a dated design (it's based on the 1985 Perkins MDi engine which is in turn based on the 1978 BL O-series petrol engine). I've never had the fuel consumption drop below 40MPG and 50MPG+ is easily attainable, despite my heavy right foot. Running it on vegetable oil reduces costs even further! Performance is very good once you're up to speed, but getting there seems to take an age. It's still pulling well when you're up to 100MPH.

The interior is pretty poor, though seems decently built. The basic dash design is from 1990 (the mid-90s Rover 400/Euro Honda Civic is based on the Japan-only Honda Domani of 1990) and it comes as a shock to realise that they were still making a car with this dashboard until 2004 when they upgraded the Rover 45. Room is good in the front, especially with the sunroof deleted - the 416Si (with sunroof) I owned before was cramped. The accommodation in the back is pretty poor though. At least the boot is big.

Driving is easy and the handling is good, despite the worn dampers. I've added original manufacturer alloys with 55-profile tyres from a Rover 25 which improve handling even more. The gearbox is pretty horrific though, when it's in gear you wouldn't even know it with the play you get in the gearstick and it's sometimes difficult to select some gears. However it's nice and high geared, which makes motorway driving quiet, with a good 85MPH at 3000rpm.

The styling is subtle, but quite attractive - if only for the saloon version (the hatchback is basically a Honda Civic - hardly a looker). You can see hints of the Rover 75 in the tail and from the side it looks almost BMW. The alloy wheels and clear side repeaters I've added definitely sharpen it up though.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th November, 2005

7th Mar 2010, 17:38

I'm sort of skeptical of reviews from people that have owned the car for a month.. Most of these reviews are positive, of course.

1997 Rover - Austin 400 Si 1.6 Twin-Cam

Summary:

Cheap and ever so sensible

Faults:

Driver's electric window regulator failed.

Vibratory engine at idle, especially from cold (possibly engine mounts). Doesn't affect the car when driving.

Heater switch only works on the top two speeds.

General Comments:

Surprisingly good small saloon from Rover, with no real build or mechanical issues. And only £600 with 12 months MOT! You couldn't buy an (awful) Ford Escort of the same age and spec for the same price.

The 1.6 Twin Cam K-series engine is revvy and responsive, thanks to the light weight of the 400 (just over a ton). I worked out the MPG to be 37mpg which is pretty good since I have a right foot of lead and it's been towing fairly heavy trailers recently. The car is very low geared though, and it's pulling nearly 3000rpm by 60mph.

The car drives much like a Honda, unsurprisingly given the Civic underpinnings - which means independent suspension by double wishbones all round, just like a Ferrari! The car is a little understeery in the wet, but it's probably due to the feeble Chinese tyres currently on it more than anything.

The styling is very grandad, but the saloon does look a lot better than the hatchback. I'm of a "boy racer" age and it's an very unsuspecting car to thrash around the countryside in. I really ought to get a tartan rug and tissue box to put on the parcel shelf...

The dashboard looks dated, but it's held up well over the past 8 years - the uphoulstery looks like your grandma's 30 year old couch though, and the faux-wood is nasty (I'm thinking of painting it piano black). The interior isn't incredibly roomy, I practically have to stoop to drive it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th July, 2005

23rd Aug 2007, 08:06

The heater fan problem you are experiencing seems to be a common fault with this car. It's also very easy to cure this very annoying problem. If you remove the glove box you will see behind it, in front of the relays,two small screws holding a plate in place. Remove these screws and withdraw the plate. You will most likely see that the resistor coil has fused. This item will unplug and can be replaced for a cost of about £20.00 from any (Ex) dealership that still stocks rover spares. Hope this helps.