1986 Toyota MR2 Mk1 SC T-Bar 1.6 SC

Summary:

Stunning

Faults:

Not a thing!

General Comments:

It's the best thing I've ever bought. Not the best CAR, but the best THING. THE most fun I've had driving. So I'm not sure I can be very objective in my review, but I've not spent anything unexpected on it, use it infrequently, and it always runs perfectly.

Admittedly it's not got the creature comfort of power steering, but that is the only thing I can think of that's missing (and it's only noticeable when you're parking up really).

Boot space is negligible, but not really the type of car you drive to move things around in. The Supercharger one (mine's a Japanese import) is apparently much better than the NA version, but I've never tried the latter.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st December, 2010

1986 Toyota MR2 1.6 16v petrol

Summary:

Best car I've owned

Faults:

Sump rusted and became porous, had to be replaced.

Needed new front steering bush to get rid of clonking sound.

Has had new radiator, alternator and water pump.

General body corrosion, especially rear arches and sills.

Has had reconditioned brake calipers all round.

Stainless steel coolant pipes at rear of engine corroded and were replaced.

General Comments:

Although the car has needed a lot of new parts in most cases they were replacing the original items. It has still been expensive to run, with manufacturers parts being excessively expensive. Dealers don't know how to look after the car - find a good specialist.

To drive the car is as good if not better than when I first had it. I have been looking for another car recently and tried out an M3, TT and Boxster, but none of them gave the same precision or connected feeling as the MR2. It's eager rather than super fast, but always fun to drive. For the money, what else are you going to find?

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th July, 2004

10th Aug 2004, 07:32

I wasn't actually saying that the MR2 is better than these other cars, rather that you feel more connected due to low weight, ideal weight distribution etc. I have just bought a TT V6 - a fabulous machine, but the MR2 is a better pure sports car.

Seeing as the car only cost me £1200 five years ago I don't have to justify the purchase!

14th Nov 2006, 06:26

Great review from someone who obviously has experienced various cars. Yes, you can compare the MR2 to the Boxster though in terms of price & performance they are different levels, but both are mid engined sports cars with similar feel. I have owned both and MR2 MK1 gives somehow more driving satisfaction. Saying that - when buying one - it not easy to find a good example - it`s not just rust, but weak engines, worn suspension & gearboxes or weak brakes that are commonplace as I have noticed.

1986 Toyota MR2 mk 1 1.6

Summary:

A schoolboys dream, turned into reality

Faults:

Nothing so far, but it does have a full service history from new, so little surprise there.

General Comments:

This car is the best I have ever driven or owned.

I've owned a fiesta, golf, cinquecento,306 and two corsas and none of these compare.

The car is very very quick for a 1600 engine and does take some getting used to, but once your comfortable it's a dream to drive.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th April, 2003

1986 Toyota MR2 Mk1 1.6 16v

Summary:

Satisfying, economical sports car

Faults:

Radiator and alternator went almost simultaneously, at 60000 miles, though as they were original parts I felt they had given reasonable service life.

Brake discs (front) keep warping.

Oil cooler pipes needed replacing.

A pair of steel coolant pipes had also corroded badly and had to be replace.

New water pump.

General Comments:

Despite its age the car has been very reliable and only let me down on the road once (radiator fractured). Some of the parts are very costly, particularly Toyota originals, and pattern parts can be hard to find. Performance is eager, especially when revved, and economy excellent (35-40 mpg). Handling very good as you would expect, though correct wheel alignment is crucial if the car is to handle properly. My advice would be to get the best car possible, even if it means spending a bit more as costs can quickly mount up.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th December, 2002