2009 Volkswagen Golf Reviews from UK and Ireland

2009 Volkswagen Golf TDI S 90 1.6 90 bhp turbo diesel

Model year2009
Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 1.6 90 bhp turbo diesel Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired13000 miles
Most recent distance38000 miles
Previous carHonda Jazz

Summary:

Still the best small hatchback money can buy!

Faults:

Nothing!

Occasionally a warning light comes on, but the light relates to something not fitted to this specification vehicle! After restarting, the light goes out again. So far, this is not a problem.

General Comments:

Wife's car. Owned for 2.5 years.

Base spec 90 BHP 1.6 diesel. Performance is adequate and the car can be hustled along nicely if needs be. Acceleration is adequate for normal everyday use, and it can overtake happily.

The 1.6 TDI is rough below 1500 RPM, and you need to make use of the gearbox to get the best out of it. A 5 speed box is fitted, but top is very high, and a 6 speed box would be an improvement.

The seats are comfortable and the dials are clear.

Control layout is very logical and easy to use.

Chunky gear change, but the brakes are a bit too light for my tastes.

Poverty spec 'S' model misses out on electric rear windows.

Also VW penny pinching means that it has no speakers in the rear doors. This means that radio has to be uncomfortably loud for front occupants for rear passengers to hear spoken words clearly. This is one of my main criticisms of the car.

Fuel economy is excellent, never dropping below 50 MPG, and with 65 MPG on a long motorway trip 4 up plus luggage at 70mph. A light right foot means that 60 MPG is readily achievable on any decent journey, and even my wife averages in the mid-50s MPG.

Next time, would go for a higher specification.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 31st January, 2013

2009 Volkswagen Golf GT 2.0 TDi 140 turbo diesel

Model year2010
Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 2.0 TDi 140 turbo diesel Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Distance when acquired4700 miles
Most recent distance6800 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Golf

Summary:

Better than the Mk5

Faults:

ESP failure warning, which caused the car to cut out whilst carrying out a turn in the road. A strange fault, and one that has not re-occurred since.

Rattle from drivers sunvisor, which is at odds with the solidity of the rest of the interior.

General Comments:

I was fortunate enough recently to have the opportunity to swap my 2008 Golf Mk5 Bluemotion Match 5 door company vehicle for a 4 month old Mk6 2.0 TDi GT 5 door.

Simply put, the Mk6 is better than the Mk5. VW have mainly succeeded in improving the all-round perceived quality, and have most definitely improved noise refinement. The new CR engine is so quiet compared to the old PD units, it's difficult to believe at times that there is a diesel under the bonnet. My old 1.9 PD was horrifically noisy by comparison. It definitely drives better than the Mk5, and overall feels more solid on the road.

One criticism I have of the way it drives is its inconsistent throttle response. Sometimes it feels extremely punchy, other times it can feel strained and strangely underpowered for what is a relatively powerful modern turbo diesel. I am sure this will improve with use.

Another criticism I have is that on closer inspection, the cost cutting that Volkswagen have undertaken to make the vehicle cheaper to produce is visible.

The rear C pillars are now plastic rather than soft touch items, and the boot plastic is now black, which shows against the roof lining.

Even more evident is the fact that the basic stereo retains the blue backlighting, which has been shunned from the dials. Frankly it does look pretty cheap, and I suppose it is pushing many private VW customers to go down the route of ticking the touchscreen hi-fi upgrade options (clever VW). Also I think it is a bit cheap not to provide dual zone climate on the GT.

Other than the ESP problem, that fortunately has not reared its ugly head again, it's been the ideal company vehicle.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 17th March, 2010

27th Jul 2010, 06:33

15000 mile update.

Car is performing admirably. Not a single thing has gone wrong since my last update, the only maintenance required has been to stick a litre of oil in it (after being warned of low oil level). It also needs a new set of Potenza RE050's on the front, but 15k on a set of fronts on a car like this really isn't bad at all.

Build quality is extremely good... had a Focus hire car a few weeks ago and it really brought home how well bolted together the Golf is, more so the quality of the plastics used. I think I was a little unfair on it in my earlier reviews.

The stand out point is how much better the motor is now performing. It would appear that these new CR engines get better with some miles under the belt. Once you have gotten out of the mindset of driving it like a traditional diesel (using the revs - up to approx 4-4.2k rather than short shifting into high gears), it really is rather quick. It's refinement and economy (now easily averaging late 40's/early 50's on a short run) has improved somewhat and is very impressive.

Over the last 5K it really has impressed and has genuinely been faultless in every way. In my last review I really did not think this would be the case. As I've mentioned before, my vehicle is a company car so I think it's probably having a harder life than it would have done if it were my own car (it is well looked after, but I do a lot of long distance driving in it, I'm really not that gentle with it and it's not washed that often!); that it's been this good is testament to how good a car it is. I hope it is still this good at 30K.

I really cannot commend the MK6 Golf enough. I still think they are too expensive (particularly the CR diesels) new and think that VW should address their pricing strategy. The equivalent A3 costs similar money. The way things stand, if it were my own money I'd probably still buy the Audi out of principle even though the Golf probably is dynamically the better car.

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 2 reviews