1992 Volvo 940 SE 2.0 turbo

Summary:

Best car I have ever had

Faults:

One of the Hand brake cables snapped at 141000 miles.

Exhaust valve in the cylinder next to the Turbo went at about 136000 miles. In September 2003 I had a cylinder head replacement at 141500, to fix this (complete with new leads, belts head gasket etc, as well as the new valve). It has again run like a dream since.

General Comments:

Engine very quiet and smooth.

Turbo cuts in when extra power required - not merely on reaching a certain level of revs.

Build quality is excellent - no rust at all on a 12 year old car.

Superb levels of comfort for driver and passengers.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th November, 2004

1992 Volvo 940 GL 2.0

Summary:

Reliable sturdy work-horse, highly recommended

Faults:

Other than the fuel pump in the tank breaking down and contaminating centre fuel pump, I have had no problems with it with the exception of the red paint work fading on the roof and bonnet.

General Comments:

Although this is a big heavy car, it has proved to be a real work-horse. I cannot fault it on Reliability, it starts every time and runs like a dream.

Performance isn't race car like, but for size and weight it isn't bad.

With 205,000 miles on the clock it is surprisingly smooth and quite drive. Comfort is pretty good.

It has proved to be quite thirsty on petrol, but this is still within acceptable levels.

I would have no hesitation recommending this car to anyone, especially if you need a strong work-horse for towing. We have towed our 23 foot caravan all over the place with no problems.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th September, 2004

11th Mar 2007, 17:02

I'm in the process of buying a 92 940 gl from my brothers friend for 3 grand. you stated the car uses a decent amount of petrol. how much? averege miles per gallon? I need to know. thanks. gave me some new insight.

12th Mar 2007, 12:25

All RWD Volvo's are not nearly as fuel efficient as the newer FWD ones. That said, the newer ones aren't nearly as easy to service, or as durable (given lack of maintenance) as the older RWD ones were.

If fuel economy is a concern, get an 850...if not, go for any one of the RWD variants, you'll be suprised at it's reliability.

1992 Volvo 940 GL estate 2.0 non turbo

Summary:

A real pleasure to drive

Faults:

Electrical fault on dashboard - warning lights used to go out - Re-soldered joint on back of meter block.

Overdrive relay.

General Comments:

A very comfortable car. An absolute pleasure to drive - diff lock helps in snow and ABS braking is superb. Automatic gearbox changes smoothly and at sensible speeds.

Despite it's enormous size its very easy to manipulate into tight spaces.

Really useful for carting things about (mattresses, fence panels, wardrobes) No need to have anything delivered again! Probably the best luxury van on the market!

Despite it's age all the extras work.

The only thing I don't like is the performance. Most of the time it's adequate, but occasionally you put your foot down and you think "It doesn't have enough go -needs a turbo" But it will do 80 all day.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th April, 2003

1992 Volvo 940 GL 2.3 non turbo

Summary:

Comfort and space are unbeatable

Faults:

Lots of strange 'electronic' faults, eventually traced to a faulty crankshaft sensor.

Speedometer became intermittent at about 120,000, dry solder joint in the dashboard.

Electric aerial has never worked properly.

Lumbar adjustment in the driver's seat broke at 130,000.

General Comments:

Have owned many Volvos in the past, this one has had more faults than others, but nearly all due to 'electronic' problems.

Seats are really comfortable - great car for long distance motor-way driving.

Loads of space - a great 'rubbish' carrier!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th May, 2001