2002 Volvo S80 Bifuel SE 2.4 petrol/LPG
Summary:
Excellent running costs and comfort. Mediocre performance, disappointing on poor surfaces
Faults:
Anti-Roll Bar replaced £42.00.
Unhappy with Tracking, had 4-Wheel Electronic Wheel Alignment done- occasioning a new noise when doing tight 180 turns. Seems to have disappeared though. Occasional strange thumps from offside rear suspension.
Front tyres v badly worn on inner edge- Alignment showed the combined toe-in was 3degrees and should have been maximum 1degree.
On rough urban surfaces, v lumpy. Speed bumps handled better in a Renault.
General Comments:
Bifuel is amazing. 210miles of motorway, Cruise set at 70mph turned in UK6.4p per mile of LPG (cost on 19th/Sept2006 39.9p per litre LPG). This beats the 1.9dci Diesel Megane by 2p a mile. Major savings.
Bifuel struggles occasionally at traffic lights. Gentle prodding of pedal required.
V big and heavy car, but still holds the line. Bothered by the suspension though, on poor surfaces. Should be a lot better. Bifuel has self-levelling suspension as standard- could be a reason.
Comfort-wise, v successful. 400miles still leaves you in the mood for dancing. The Sat-Nav is good. The TV is pretty cool. Take a break from driving, watch some tv, hit the road again. V good. TV not sold on the new S80- This may be a rare accessory in future.
Stability Traction Control v convincing. Well worth making standard in every car, as the EU is proposing to do.
BTW- In a Bifuel model, the gas tanks are placed under the rear seats and in the spare wheel pit. There is no spare.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 20th September, 2006
17th Aug 2005, 18:55
I completely agree with you; the only problem that I have and that I don't understand is this car is soo unreliable and has soo many problems that usually repeat themselves.