ARO 243 Reviews

1988 ARO 243 from North America

Model year1988
Year of manufacture1988
First year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.4 / 10
Distance when acquired121000 kilometres
Most recent distance140000 kilometres
Previous carFord F150

Summary:

Built like a tank

Faults:

No heat, the fan is dead. No factory AC.

Vehicle is poorly insulated and no soundproofing. Seats uncomfortable. It seems as if the manufacturer did not pay any attention to the small details.

Fuel pump went.

General Comments:

Overall a decent off road vehicle, and the perfect hunting truck.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th August, 2011

1978 ARO 243 3.1 diesel from Romania

Model year1978
Year of manufacture1978
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 3.1 diesel Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired45000 kilometres
Most recent distance55000 kilometres
Previous carARO 244

Summary:

Good off-road performance vs no on-road performance

Faults:

A heat hose from a supplemental heater (not originally installed by the factory) got severed, which impaired the cooling system's operation (water leaks). I bypassed it and continued.

The fan belt tore off, as it was very old. I continued without the fan to the nearest shop, got a new one, and installed it.

The engine starter (which was not original, rather an adaptation) malfunctioned, and I had to service it.

Otherwise, believe it or not, no other problems.

General Comments:

Extremely noisy, with a lot of diesel vibrations, and a lot of torque for that matter. (which is a good trade-off in my opinion).

The independent front suspension is surprisingly comfortable on-road, provided that all the bushes and springs are in good condition, however it's not as reliable off-road as a live axle would be.

The clutch needs some tuning from time to time, but otherwise being hydraulic it operates very well (if properly tuned) and copes with the engine's torque.

The drive train is very sturdy, I haven't had any problems with it, and wheel travel is good in stock version.

Overall a competent off-road car at a very low price - the downside of which is regular maintenance (some grease here, some oiling there, some tweaks somewhere else, etc).

I'm looking to get several more.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd February, 2009

Average review marks: 6.1 / 10, based on 2 reviews