2005 BMW X5 from North America

Summary:

Absolute junk

Faults:

Goes through brakes and rotors every 1500 miles.

General Comments:

The worst car I have ever owned. It starting going through brakes and rotors every 1500 miles at 14,000 miles. Started with horrible, almost uncontrollable shimmy and shaking. After several service visits, the dealer blamed me; said I must have been driving with two feet. This is even though I have two other 5 Series sedans with over 60,000 miles on them with no brake issues. Even the service manager said their answer was a lie. Wouldn't even warranty the car anymore. I sold it immediately to CarMax. What still bothers me to this day is that another dealer told me that it showed up on his computer as suffering a catastrophic failure six months later.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 24th February, 2010

25th Feb 2010, 06:41

This is a prime example of customers taking a dealer's word for it, and accepting it as an explanation. Brakes on any BMW aren't cheap, and are a service money maker. One thing's for sure, if the X5's brakes are failing drivers, then there will be a lot of people having the 'Ultimate Driving Experience'. Glad you sold it.

24th Mar 2022, 15:21

I've never owned an X5, but I do own a Land Rover. Big brakes mean you need a good rotor, high end EBC maybe and a nice ceramic pad Akeebono is my go to. Also cleaning the brake parts and lubrication are recommended. Brakes are an art form. If you cut corners you'll be back sooner than you wanted to.

2005 BMW X5 Sport 3.0 turbo diesel from UK and Ireland

Summary:

Great motorway car. Slightly dodgy auto box means it's less good for around town

Faults:

So far nothing.

General Comments:

First thing, I have only had this car for a month or so therefore I haven't really given it much chance to break. I didn't really go looking for an X5 - I had two 5 series saloons previously that were great, but needing to transport a couple of dogs and some musical equipment regularly, I really wanted an estate. 5 series estates are like hens-teeth, whereas the X5 is reasonably common, so that's what I ended up with.

After the 5 Series the X5 feels big. It isn't that much bigger in real terms, but the seating position means you can't see any of the edges, which makes parking in Tescos interesting - hopefully I'll get used to it. Don't get one without parking sensors!

The interior is more-or-less stolen straight out of the E39 5-series. In some respects that makes it a bit dated, but on the other hand, it was one of their best interiors. The dash doesn't curve towards to driver like the saloon does, and that makes some of the more distant buttons a bit of a reach. It doesn't feel quite so driver centered either. Other than that, it's pure BMW comfort and quality. Practicality is good - good sized boot area and seats that fold flat.

Mines the 3.0d Sport - they nearly all are. It's more than fast enough, especially considering the weight. The suspension is a bit stiff and that does make the ride a bit bouncy. Despite what people say, you won't forget you are in a big 4x4, but the ride is impressive nevertheless. I've been driving around in the snow, and considering it isn't a "proper" off-road vehicle, it gets me places a 5-series saloon never would have.

If there is a disappointment it's the automatic gearbox. I've been doing some looking around on the Internet and I don't think I'm alone. It's a 6 speed self-learning job, and frankly, it's a bit stupid. The change is not as smooth as I would expect, and having 6 speeds just means that it changes a lot. Around town it results in a rather uneven ride. It can be very sluggish sometimes, particularly a junctions when you don't want it to be. When you hit the gas and nothing happens, it's very disconcerting. The reaction is to hit the gas harder and that just means that when it does change you get "slammed" out of the junction. Not good enough for an expensive BMW. I guess I'll learn to drive around it, but I shouldn't have to.

A very good car all in all, only marred by the sub-standard auto transmission.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd February, 2009