2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3.4L V6 from North America

Model year2007
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 3.4L V6 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.3 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 kilometres
Most recent distance133000 kilometres
Previous carChevrolet Monte Carlo

Summary:

Confidence on 4 wheels

Faults:

Stereo speakers cut out intermittently, although they're working now.

Rear defrost stopped working.

Heater blew cold air. Fixed it myself.

Small rattle in the driver's door.

General Comments:

I just returned from a 1,600 km road trip, and my Monte Carlo made the long drive a pleasure. Comfort, great fuel economy and enough power to go from 120km/h to 160 km/h in 3-4 seconds when passing. The car also gets a lot of second looks, because with midnight blue colour and custom rims, it looks very unique compared to all the 4-door cookie cutter cars on the road.

In the city it is also very quick and agile, with handling and brakes that are like what you would expect on a higher priced sports car.

Although there are a few minor quality issues, none of them affect the car's purpose of getting you where you want to go.

I have found this car to be extremely reliable, and I feel very safe and confident driving it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th May, 2013

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3.5 V6 from North America

Model year2007
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 3.5 V6 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired27 miles
Most recent distance12000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Monte Carlo

Summary:

Nice car, smooth ride, and sufficient power for the highway

Faults:

I don't like the low ceiling, you almost have to low ride, with your seat back far to avoid hitting your head.

General Comments:

Nice overall ride and look. I am 6"5 and fit perfectly!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 27th May, 2009

28th May 2009, 09:56

"I don't like the low ceiling, you almost have to low ride, with your seat back far to avoid hitting your head."

"Nice overall ride and look. I am 6"5 and fit perfectly!!"

Okay, I'm very confused.

The two above statements make up the entire body of the review. The statements also contradict each other.

So, which is it - Is the "ceiling" too low? Or do you fit perfectly?

(Wow, my comment is longer than the original review.)

Average review marks: 9.1 / 10, based on 2 reviews