2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo review from North America
"A beautiful machine!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No major faults!
I was not impressed by how some of the plastic parts were not fitted properly. For example, there were jagged seams on the interior door locks which looked as if the excess plastic from the mold injection process hadn't been trimmed away.
General comments?
This was a 2-day rental.
I was very impressed with this car's performance. It was peppy, quiet and handled beautifully.
Recommended reviews
| 2005 - Monte Carlo LS 3.4 LA1 207cid Chevy had a misfire on this design. |
|
| 2003 - Monte Carlo Base 3.4 Liter V6 Good car except for brakes and headlights |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2004 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 5000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 5500 kilometres |
| Previous car | Nissan 100NX |
| Date of Entry | 18th October, 2004 |