2002 Daewoo Tacuma CX review from Singapore
"Value for space and stability."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
So far nothing has gone wrong with the car. Fuel meter was stuck, but after 2 full tanks it functioned properly.
Original Korean tires was a bit noisy, so changed to quieter Japanese tires.
General comments?
Great for putting the whole family (3 adults and 3 kids) on a trip to a resort with 3 mountain bikes hanging on the back.
Fuel consumption could be better though, 11litres/100km, but to be expected for a car of this weight. As stable as a 2000 Honda Accord because of its weight.
Engine a bit rough though. It probably is due to the extra push needed for the heavy car.
Recommended reviews
| Comfortable, but some minor problems |
|
| Technology and quality at stone age levels |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 6 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 6 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 2200 kilometres |
| Previous car | Toyota Corolla |
| Date of Entry | 20th March, 2003 |